
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Tarun Rohilla
Respondant Advocate Rakhi Verma
C.C.No.393 of 2017.Bhawnish Vs. Syska Gadget Secure etc.Present: Sh. Tarun Rohilla, Adv. for the complainant. Ms. Rakhi Verma, Adv. for the Op.No.1. Op No.2 already exparte. Ld. Counsel for both the parties stated at bar that they have reached at compromise. State...
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Garg
Respondant Advocate Vijay Sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/17/2401. VinodR/o Bansudhar po khere khan Distt SirsaSirsaHaryana ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Syska Gadget Secure Insurance CoRidhi Sidhi Mobile SirsaSirsaHaryana ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Roshan Lal Ahuja PRESIDENTHON...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/497/2017Date of Institution:04/07/2017Date of Decision:19/01/2018Ranjit Singh s/o Raghbir Singh r/o House No.189, Sector 38-A, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. Syska LED Lights (P)...
Case Number: 497
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate JD Garg
Respondant Advocate HS Raghav
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/17/571. Dr NeerajDabwali Road SirsaSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Syska Insurance CompanyWadhwa Mob Care Near Jaipur Hospital circular Road SirsaSirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Roshan Lal Ahuja PRESIDENT...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate C A NANDAKUMAR
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMI.A.1647/2017 IN APPEAL NO.775/17JUDGMENT DATED:09.01.2018 PRESENT : HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI. S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN: PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V.JOSE : MEMBERSreekumar, S/o Thankappan Nair,Latha Sadanam,...
Case Number: 775
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2018
Court Name: Gurdaspur
Appelant Advocate Sh.Rajesh Kumar Choudhary H.C.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Varun Gosain, Adv. for OP. No.2. OP. No.1 exparte.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPURDISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPURPHONE NO. 01874-245345Complaint Case No. CC/366/20171. Anil KumarDy commandant Sector BSF Gurdaspur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Syska HousePlot No.89,90,91 Lane No.4 Sakore Nagar Office...
Case Number: 366
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A K Maleri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.300 of 2017Date of Institution04.12.2017Date of Decision06.12.2017Mrs.Sartaj wife of Shri Hafeez Ahmed resident of 1593/1, Sector 30-B, Chandigarh …..Appellant/Complainant VersusSyka (in f...
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
The complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same c...
Case Number: 910
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Aanchal Thakur
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 144 OF 2017in CC/264/2016Asha Kumari Jaswal Vs The General Manager, Syska Gadget Secure & another BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Ms.Aanchal Th...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Syska in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Syska ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Syska under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.