
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vikas Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ashok Vohra
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 226 of 2020 Date of instt.30.06.2020 Date of Decision:19.09.2023Amit Kumar aged about 38 years son of Shri Hukam Chand, resident of Sandhala P.O. Gumthala, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar. ...
Case Number: 226
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2023
Court Name: Vizianagaram
Appelant Advocate Sri K. Seetham Naidu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2022
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2023
Court Name: Charkhi Dadri
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHARKHI DADRIComplaint Case No. CC/122/2023( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2023 )1. Jitender Kumaraged 38 years son of Sh. Raghvir Singh, resident of ward No. 18, M.C. Colony, Charkhi Dadri, Tehsil & Distt. Charkhi Dadri............Compla...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2023
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2023
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Shri Pawan Sabharwal
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/26/2023( Date of Filing : 04 Jul 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/20/2521. Smt. Vivek KumariW/o Sh. Pawan Sabharwal aged about 36 years R/o D-1750, SF, Sushant City, Ansal, Panipat (Haryana...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2023
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2023
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate SHIVANNA MR. BHARADWAJ S. IYENGAR & MR. SUDHANSHU PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate M/S. AKT LAW ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 361 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 11/02/2021 in Appeal No. 751/2019 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SRI THIRUMALLESHSHRI THIRUMALLESH S/O LATE M. SHIVANNA RESIDING AT 701, NEW NO.4,IV CROSS, NEA...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2021
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2023
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Joshi Ahlawat
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Arya
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 490/2018( Date of Filing : 11 Oct 2018 )1. Sandeep Garg S/o Sh. Om Parkash R/oH.No. 2147/2 Ward No. 5, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.Office at Plot No.1, Nelson M...
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.S. Bisaria
Respondant Advocate No Advocate (OP)
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/654/2021( Date of Filing : 17 Dec 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/08/2021 in Case No. C/2015/279 of District Varanasi)1. Maruti Suzuki India L...
Case Number: 654
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N G MAHESH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMFirst Appeal No. A/16/229( Date of Filing : 05 Apr 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/11/2014 in Case No. CC/268/2013 of District Kottayam)1. MARUTHI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.. ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SUDHAMAN K M .. ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2023
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Sarabjeet Sardhana
Respondant Advocate
Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/121/2022( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2022 )1. Surjeet SinghH. No. 539, Village- Badrola...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. & OthersPlote No.1, Phase 3IMT............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: ...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2023
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AKT LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN,LAKSHMI RAO, AKRITI, PRATEEK YADAV & SHIVA. K
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 780-781 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 10/07/2019 in Appeal No. 177/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka) 1. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED REGD. OFFICE, 1, NELSON MANDELA ROAD, VASANTKUNJ, NEW DELHI-1...
Case Number: 780
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Suzuki in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Suzuki ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Suzuki under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.