company-name-logo

Sugar

Latest Judgments

Total 355 Consumer Court Cases Against Sugar.

Uttar Pradesh

Daurala Sugar V/S Ankur Verma

Sugar  

Court Name: Meerut

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/50/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Feb 2020 )1. Ankur VermaMeerut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Daurala SugarMeerut............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PRESENT:Dated : 07 Apr 2020 Final Order / Judgement Disposal...

Case Number: 50

|

Date of Filing: 28-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2022

Gujarat

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SARDAR CO-OPARATIVE SUGAR IND V/S VASNA KOSINDRAR GROUP COTTON AND SEEDS SUPLY SOC.

Sugar  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate P V MOORJANI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2020

Gujarat

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SARDAR CO-OPARATIVE SUGAR IND V/S VASNA KOSINDRAR GROUP COTTON AND SEEDS SUPLY SOC.

Sugar  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate P V MOORJANI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2020

Gujarat

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SARDAR CO-OPARATIVE SUGAR IND V/S VASNA KOSINDRAR GROUP COTTON AND SEEDS SUPLY SOC.

Sugar  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate P V MURJANI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2020

Gujarat

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SARDAR CO-OPARATIVE SUGAR IND V/S VASNA KOSINDRAR GROUP COTTON AND SEEDS SUPLY SOC.

Sugar  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate P V MOORJANI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2020

Gujarat

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SARDAR CO-OPARATIVE SUGAR IND V/S VASNA KOSINDRAR GROUP COTTON AND SEEDS SUPLY SOC.

Sugar  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate P V MOORJANI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2020

Telangana

The Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd., Now known as Deccan Sugar Factory Ltd V/S Kondaparty Chandra Mouli

Sugar  

Court Name: Nalgonda

Appelant Advocate G.Prakash

Respondant Advocate P.Praveen babu

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMNALGONDAComplaint Case No. CC/16/2014( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2014 )1. Kondaparty Chandra MouliH.No.7-6-76, Baharpet, Bhongiri, Nalgonda District. NalgondaAP ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd., Now known as Deccan Sugar Factory ...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2020

Uttar Pradesh

Sherwani Sugar Syndicate Ltd V/S Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd

Vidyut   Sugar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Isar Husain

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1275/2019( Date of Filing : 31 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/10/2019 in Case No. C/40/2018 of District Kanshiram Nagar)1. Dakshinanchal ...

Case Number: 1275

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2020

NCDRC

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. V/S M/S. SHRI DURGA KHANDSARI SUGAR MILLS

The New India Assurance   New India Assurance   Sugar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN KHOSLA & MS. SHREEANKA KAKKAR

Respondant Advocate MR. K.K. BHAT, SANDEEP BISHT, GIRIJAPATI KAUSHAL, SHRUTI AWASTHI & RAHUL KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1899 OF 20161. M/S. SHRI DURGA KHANDSARI SUGAR MILLSMendrana, P.O. Kansul,Tehsil Pansemal, Distt. Barwani Madhya Pradesh 451770...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.SENDHWA BRAN...

Case Number: 1899

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-01-2020

Maharashtra

AUTHORISED OFFICER,BALIRAJA SUGAR FACTRY V/S BHAGVAT SUBHANRAO SHINDE

Sugar  

Court Name: Parbhani

Appelant Advocate ADV.G.B.BHALERAO

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 191

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 16-11-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sugar in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sugar ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Sugar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.