
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.S. Chauhan
Respondant Advocate Gagan Sehgal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no. 171 of 2012 Date of instt.: 21.12.2012 Date of decision 14.09.2016Mehar Singh son of Shri Darshan Singh, resident of village Janesaron, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal …………..C...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/278/20151. Rajesh KumarSon of Jagdish Sharma vpo Devsar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Spice mobileSunny Mobile Hansi Gate Bhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Anamika Gupta MEMBERHON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2016
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Surender Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Kunal Juneja
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 180/20141. BijenderBijender son of Shri Umed Singh r/o V.P.O.Brahmanwas Tehsil and District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Spice Mobile1. Spice Mobility Limited, Global Knowledge Park,...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vikas Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate Rajan Bhatia OP No.1,OP No.2 exparte
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No…298 of 2014. Date of institution: 09.07.2014. Date of decision: 02.02.2016.Parveen Kumar Goyal aged about 45 years son of Sh. Tirlok Chand Goyal resident of House No. 431, Krishna Building...
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2016
Court Name: Ajmer
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/100/20151. ASHOK KUMARAJMER...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SPICE MOBILE LTD.AJMER............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Vinay Kumar Goswami PRESIDENT Naveen Kumar MEMBER Jyoti Dosi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERजिला...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2016
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Complainant in person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Kunal Juneja
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/15/1251. ManjeetManjeet Ro Bhag Wali Gali Vijay Nagar near Jhajjar Chungi Rohtak. RohtakHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Spice MobileSpice Mobile Phone Company Mobile Head Set Divisio...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92CC No.280/2015:In the matter of:Sh. Mohd. SaleemS/o. Sh. Jamaluddin,R/o. 2473, KatraRajjiMohalla,Niyarian G.B. Road, Delhi – 110 096Complainant VsNaresh ...
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2015
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar
Respondant Advocate Madan Singh
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 98/20141. Surender Kumar Son of Nanu Ram Loharu Road Bhiwani BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Budh Dev Yadav PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Balraj Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. Anita Sheoran MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERBEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPU...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2015
Court Name: Aligarh
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
न्यायलय जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष फोरमअलीगढComplaint Case No. CC/55/20121. VINAY KUMAR AGE 32YEARSS/O SRI RAMNATH R/O GANDHI NAGAR GALI NO3 ETAWA BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. R.H.PRASAD PRESIDE...
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Jaipur-I
Appelant Advocate VANDANA VARMA
Respondant Advocate VIKASH MISHRA
जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष मंच, जयपुर प्रथम, जयपुरसमक्ष: श्री राकेश कुमार माथुर - अध्यक्ष श्�...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Spice Mobile in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Spice Mobile ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Spice Mobile under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.