
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM PANCHKULA. Execution Application No:26 of 2015Date of Institution:01.05.2015Date of Decision:17.07.2015Shagun Sood, A 402, 4th floor, Imperial Tower, Peermuchaila, Adjacent Sector-20, Panchkula, Zirakpur, Distt. Mohali (Punjab...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2015
Court Name: Sundargarh II
Appelant Advocate Babaji sahoo
Respondant Advocate P.S.Naik
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSUNDARGARH-II, ROURKELAComplaint Case No. cc/112/20131. AVILASH SAHU At-FL-229,Basanti colony, po-RKL-12, sundargarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony india pvt ltd.at-A-31 Mohan co-operative industrial eastate,Mathura,Road new delhi-...
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2015
Court Name: Akola
Appelant Advocate Ajay Joshi
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Akola ( Maharashtra ) District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Akola ( M.S.) Complaint Case No. CC/14/1321. Ajay Shivshankar KhemakaR/o. Toshniwal Lay out,Ram Nagar, AkolaAkolaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2015
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/929/11 Dated: In the matter of:Smt. Neeru,W/o Sh. Inderjeet,C-313, Pragati Vihar, New Delhi-110003……..COMPLAINANTVERSUSMr...
Case Number: 929
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2015
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sunil tripathi
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/1871. Kuldeep SinghSon of Baldev singh r/o H.No.20884 st.No.18, Ajit road, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Ind...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2015
Court Name: Jodhpur-II
Appelant Advocate ABDUL SALEEM
Respondant Advocate RAJESH PANWAR
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDERESSL FORUM JODHPUR 2RAJASTHANComplaint Case No. CC/640/20151. ILIYAS KHANJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT LTDJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. TAFFAZUL HUSAIN SAMMA PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SMT SUNITA KACHHAWAHA...
Case Number: 640
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2015
Court Name: Sambalpur
Appelant Advocate P.P. Panigrahi
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/48/20141. Geeta Rani PandaR/o. Sonapali Chowk, P.O.-Dhankauda, Via.- Remed-768006, Dist.-Sambalpur............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Private LimitedA-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate Mathura Road,New DeLHI-110044.2. Sai Info...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
Court Name: Bhadrak
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMBHADRAKComplaint Case No. CC/82/2014( Date of Filing : 21 Oct 2014 )1. Sri Manoj Ku Ray , S/O Jadunath RayVill/Po- Ertal , Ps- Dhusuri , Dist- Bhadrak...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1- Sales Dealer , Jyotsna Sales , Nayan Sahoo Market C...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2019
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. S. P. Dhamdhere
Respondant Advocate
District consumer Disputes Redressal Forum NandedVisava Nagar, V.I.P. Road, NandedComplaint Case No. CC/14/2791. RANJIT RAMKISHAN SHARMADivisional Railway Hospital, Hingoli Gate, Flyover, Nanded-431601NandedMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. LdtMathura R...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2015
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Avinit Avasthi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:390 of 2014Date of Institution:01.08.2014Date of Decision:30.06.2015Ashish Doomra son of Navdeep Doomra, resident of H.No.70-D, Sunny Enclave, Kharar, Punjab. …..ComplainantVersus1] S...
Case Number: 390
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.