Sony
Latest Judgments
Total 2102 Consumer Court Cases Against Sony.
SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) P. LTD. V/S JAIBIR DRALL
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/222/20131. JAIBIR DRALLH.NO. 513, PANA RAMAYAN, VILLAGE & P.O. TIKRI KALAN, DELHI 41...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) P. LTD.18/17, W.E.A., KAROL BAGH, N D 6............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAKESH...
Case Number: 222
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2015
SONY INDIA& OTHERS. V/S SURINDER KUMAR.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP SINGH.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:101 of 2015Date of Institution:01.06.2015Date of Decision:19.10.2015 Surinder Kumar Sood, Flat No.405, GH-9, Sector 20, near Police Station, Panchkula-134109. ….ComplainantVersusSony In...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2015
Om Prakash Pandey V/S Mahindra & mahindra Sony Tractors
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate O.P. Srivastva
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2162/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/12/2013 in Case No. c/16/2010 of District Lakhimpur Khiri)1. Mahindra & mahindra Sony TractorsLakhimpur khe...
Case Number: 2162
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2015
M/S SONY INDIA LTD. V/S AMIT SETH
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 319/20121. AMIT SETH R/O S F 42/3, JUDGES COLONY, SECTOR-9, VAISHALI, DISTT. GHAZIABAD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SONY INDIA LTD.A-31, MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MATHURA ROAD, NEW DELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE...
Case Number: 319
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2015
SUDHIR NAUDIYAL V/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :7.10.2015Revision Petition No. 72/15. (Setting aside the order dated 6.8.2014 passed in Complaint Case No.61/15 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal For...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2015
The Managing Director ,Future Generali India life Insurance V/S Deepak Sony
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 884
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2015
Shikha Dhar Sony India Pvt. Ltd. V/S P. Bhanuchander
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/15/16551. P. Bhanuchander S/o. P. Venkatappa, R/at. no. 5, 1st floor, street no. 4, Dayananda layout, Ramamurthynagar, Bengaluru-016.2. P. VenkatappaFather of...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2015
SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD V/S RAJAT KUMAR RATHOR
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAExecution Application No. EX30/2011InCC190/20101. RAJAT KUMAR RATHOR 7/201 TULSHI CHVOTRA TAJGANJ AGRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD18/17 WES KROLBAGH NEW ...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2016
The Managing Director, Branch Office, Sony India Private Limited V/S V.G.Natarajan S/o Govindaswamy
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate A.K.Devendiran
Respondant Advocate OP1 and 3 S.K. Arunachalam
...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2015
Sony India Pvt. LTd. V/S Shubham
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate N.S.Jagdeva
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:31 of 2015Date of Institution:22/01/2015Date of Decision:30.09.2015Shubham s/o Sanjay Verma r/o circular road, Gandhi, chowk, Batan Market, Bittu di hatti, (kitchen hut) Abhor Distt. Fazilka...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.