
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/1416/2014( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2014 )1. GAGAN DEEPH NO.397,SECTOR-5,PKT B-5,ROHINI,DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY I...
Case Number: 1416
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2018
Court Name: Pathanamthitta
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumPathanamthittaCDRF Lane, NannuvakkaduPathanamthitta Kerala 689645Complaint Case No. CC/14/791. Sony MathewS/O Mathew, Plamoottil House, Nellickamon P.O., Ranni, PathanamthittaPathanamthitta...........Complainant(s)Versus1. St Gregorious Education ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2017
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/3561. Gokul Ramanujam154 Battalion Boarder Security Force, Integarted Check Post, Attari, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2017
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110092C.C. NO. 970/13Shri. SANJAY GARGR/O- 4/1997 STREET NO. 16VISHWAS NAGARSHAHDRA ….ComplainantM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. OFFICE A...
Case Number: 970
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2017
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate RAJESH VIJAYENDRAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/16/2421. JAYALAKSHMI ATHEKKETHAMARACHALIL,VADAKODE P.O. KANGARAPPADY,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT LTDREGISTERED OFFICE AT A-31,MOHAN COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,MATH...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST) GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI 150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution: 19.07.2016Complaint Case. No.480/16 Date of order: 26.04.2017IN MATTER OFPriyanka Agarwal, House No. 669, Main Sag...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2017
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None Appeared.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALACASE NO: CC- 16 of 2017Sri Dipraj Debbarma, S/O- Sri Lalit Debbarma, Ujjan Abhoynagar, Near Puthiba Mandir, Agartala, West Tripura. ..…..…...Complainants. VERSUS 1. Sony India Private Ltd., A...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate Madhusudan Das
Respondant Advocate
DCDRF North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Complaint Case No. CC/413/20161. Raghubir Bhagat449/1, Renu Majumdar Saraqni, Government Colony ,P.O. and p.S. barrackpore, kol-12 north 24 ParganasWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager of Sony Mobile Service Centr...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: Ganjam
Appelant Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Mr. A.K.Singh, Mr. N.R.Patnaik, Mr. N.Haldar, Advocates.
Respondant Advocate Exparte
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURComplaint Case No. CC/43/20161. Bhairab Chandra BrahmaC/o. Eastern Media Times, Giri Road, Berhampur, Dist. Ganjam - 7600 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. LtdA-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, M...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/13/58InComplaint Case No. CC/12/3911. Saji SonySanthosh Vilasam, Kanjiramkulam...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Balu, Mars-Inn Home MateMalayinkil, TVPM...........Respond...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.