
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC/110/2017 AMAN KR. SINGH V/SSONY INDIADate : 01.05.2019Present : None for complainant, None has appeared on behalf of the complainant. The case has been called several times. Now it is 3.00 p.m. The complainant did not appear on the last date of hearing nor he has appeared to...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Complainant in Person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Kumar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/45( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2019 )1. Birender SinghS/o Sh. Rajbir Singh R/o H.No. 997/21, Prem Nagar, Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.Raj Complex, Adjoining T...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Complainant in Person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjay Kumar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/46( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2019 )1. Jitender RanaJitender Rana S/o Sh. rajbir Singh R/o h.No. 997/21, Prem Nagar, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt Ltd. Raj Complex,...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2019
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 151 of 2018 Date of Institution : 14.05.2018 Date of decision : 18.04.2019Avtar Singh Aged 46 Years, s/o Sh. Bant Ram, r/o House No.29 Ganesh Garden, Near Ekta Vihar, Ambala Cantt-133001, Haryan...
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL VERMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 924 of 2018Date of Institution: 26.07.2018Date of Decision : 12.04.2019Dilshad Khan son of Sh. Hazrat Ali, resident of Village Samalkha, New Delhi-110037. Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. Sony India...
Case Number: 924
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2019
Court Name: Rayagada
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Self
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,STATE: ODISHA.C.C. Case No. 124/ 2018. Date. 18 . 3 . 2019P R E S E N T .Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President.Sri Gadadhara Sahu, Member.Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, Member.Sri Rajib Ataka, At: Rellibadinga, Po: Therubali, Dist:Ray...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Singh
Respondant Advocate Ram Gopal
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/2022( Date of Filing : 14 Sep 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Sony Indiaa...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2019
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)150-151; COMMUNINTY CENTRE; C-BLOCK; JANAK PURI; NEW DELHI-110058CASE NO. 744/2016MS. RITU GOYAL ADD- 28/142, WEST PATEL NAGAR,NEW DELHI-110008. …..ComplainantVERSUSSONY INDIA LIMITED.ADD- A-31, MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIA...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2019
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh Pritpal Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/305/2016( Date of Filing : 19 Jul 2016 )1. Hitesh Bhardwaj R/o H.No.1185,Urban Estate,Phase-IIJalandharPunjab...........Comp...
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2019
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.