company-name-logo

Seeds

Latest Judgments

Total 5708 Consumer Court Cases Against Seeds.

NCDRC

UTTAM & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 970

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

RESHMA & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 971

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

DHANANJAY & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 972

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

SHYAM & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 973

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

SANTOSHI BALASAHEB JADHAV & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 974

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

RAJARAM & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 975

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

PANDURANG RANGNATH PATIL & ORS. V/S DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK KSHIRSAGAR & MR. AKHILESH YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 966 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 15/06/2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. DISTRICT MANAGER, MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Office at Samta Colony, Teh...

Case Number: 976

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

NCDRC

RAMESHWAR CHOUDHRY V/S RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1718 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 01/05/2018 in Appeal No. 990/2017 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,PANT KRISHI BHAWAN...

Case Number: 1718

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2018

NCDRC

OM PRAKASH V/S RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1719 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 01/05/2018 in Appeal No. 991/2017 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,PANT KRISHI BHAWAN...

Case Number: 1719

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 06-07-2018

Circuit Bench Nagpur

NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN / MANAGING DIRECTOR URAGAHALLI, BIDADI. V/S SHRI.SHRAWAN KASHIRAM ZADAWANE R/O AT POST MURMADI, TAH MAUDA , DISTT. NAGPUR .

Seeds  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MRS.S.K.PAUNIKAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/15/199( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/02/2015 in Case No. CC/02/2014 of District Nagpur)1. SHRI.SHRAWAN KASHIRAM ZADAWANE R/O AT POST MURMADI, TAH MA...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 25-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.