
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 402/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERCo-ordinator,IT @ School Project, Poojappura P.O, Thiruvananthapuram.: APPELLANT...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 808/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERDistrict Office,IT @ School, Malappuram, : APPELLANTMalappuram, PIN-676 505.(By ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 810/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERState Project Office,IT @ School Project, Poojappura P.O, Thiruvananthapuram.: A...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate Faisal P
Respondant Advocate
C.D.R.F. KasaragodKeralaComplaint Case No. CC/15/251. Aliya Senior Secondary SchoolPrincipal, Paravanadukkam PO - 671313KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Educomp Solutions Ltd.1211, Padma Tower - 15 Rajendra Palace, New Delhi - 110008New DelhiDelhi2. M/s. Edu ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. G.P. Singh
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 342 of 2010 Date of instt.: 10.05.2010 Date of decision:31 .03.2016Aarushi Singhal daughter of Sh.S.C.Singhalc/o Singla Hospital, 37/13, Extension Urban Estate, Karnal.. ……..Complainant. ....
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2016
Court Name: Ajmer
Appelant Advocate ADV.MAHESH AGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/331/20141. RITWIK SHARMAAJMER...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M.S.S.PUBLIC SCHOOLAJMER............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Vinay Kumar Goswami PRESIDENT Naveen Kumar MEMBER Jyoti Dosi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERजि�...
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2016
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/2693/20131. Dr. Sandio DeshpandeS/o M. N Deshpande Aged about 39 Years, R/at No.C/504, RNS Shanthi Nivas Tumkur Road,Goraguntepalya , Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Principal Euro School FoundationNo.15, Chimney...
Case Number: 2693
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
None present for the appellant. None was present on 07.10.15, 14.12.15 and 04.02.16. On previous four dates also, though the counsel for the appellant appeared, time was sought as the arguing counsel was not present.Hence, enough opportunities were granted to the counsel for the ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2016
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate P.L. Dhaudhary
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 81Date of Institution : 22.06.2015Date of Decision : 21.03.2016Dasmesh Public School, Talwandi Road, Faridkot through its Director Sh Gurcharan Singh. .....ComplainantVersus1. M/s Pearson Education Services Pvt ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 585 of 2014Date of Institution: 07.07.2014Date of Decision : 17.03.2016Shanti Public Senior Secondary School, Palwal, through its Principal Rajender Kumar Appellant/Opposite Party No.1Versus1. Vinod...
Case Number: 585
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.