Runwal Developers
Latest Judgments
Total 21 Consumer Court Cases Against Runwal Developers.
AMIT MANIKLAL BHANDARI & ANR. V/S RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MALVIKA KALRA & MR. NATABARATTA BHATTACHARYA
Respondant Advocate MR. MOHIT P. BHANSALI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 43 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 24/03/2021 in Complaint No. 115/2019 of the State Commission Maharashtra)1. RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. AMIT MANIKLAL BHANDARI ...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2021
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2021
AMIT MANIKLAL BHANDARI & ANR. V/S RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MALVIKA KALRA & MR. NATABARATTA BHATTACHARYA
Respondant Advocate MR. MOHIT P. BHANSALI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 42 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 24/03/2021 in Complaint No. 114/2019 of the State Commission Maharashtra)1. RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. AMIT MANIKLAL BHANDARI ...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2021
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2021
RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD V/S SHRI. RAJESH D. RAJESHIRKE
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate ADV PADMANABH PISE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2019
RUNWAL DEVELOPERS Pvt.Ltd. & ORS V/S ASHTON LAWRENCE & ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate UDAY WAVIKAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2018
M/s RUNWAL DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. & 3 ORS., V/S Mrs. ARUNA S. NAIK & ANR.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/s A & A LAW,
Respondant Advocate MARATHE & MARATHE ASSOCIATES, R1 TO R4,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 334 OF 20141. Mrs. ARUNA S. NAIK & ANR.,Through their Attorney, Shri Ratnakar N Naik, A-9/104, Veena Nagar, L.B.S. Marg, Mulund (W),MUMBAI - 400080............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s RUNWAL DEVELOPERS (...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
DINESH HEGDE V/S RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ALMT LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MRS. BINDU JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2014 IN RP/4108/20121. RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. DINESH HEGDE...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BL...
Case Number: 203
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2014
M/s RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., V/S Shri SUBRAMANIAN YEGNASWAMY,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. M. DESHMUKH,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 440 OF 20131. Shri SUBRAMANIAN YEGNASWAMY,Secretary, M/s Runwal Pride 'C' Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd., Flat No. C-1001, Runwal Pride 'C' Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd., L.B.S. Marg, Behind R-Mall, Mulund (W),MUMBAI - 40008...
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. V/S DINESH HEGDE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BINDU JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4108 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/08/2012 in Appeal No. 444/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.RUNWAL & OMKAR ESQUARE, 5tH FLOOR, OPP SION CHUNNABHATTI SIGNAL, ...
Case Number: 4890
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2014
DINESH HEGDE V/S RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ALMT LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MRS. BINDU JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4108 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/08/2012 in Appeal No. 444/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.RUNWAL & OMKAR ESQUARE, 5tH FLOOR, OPP SION CHUNNABHATTI SIGNAL, ...
Case Number: 4108
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2014
RUNWAL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD V/S DINESH HEGDE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT BINDU JAIN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/444(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/04/2011 in Case No. 97/2011 of District Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban))1. DINESH HEGDE C/11 CYNARA OPPOSITE MUKUND LBS MARG KURLA WEST MUMB...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Runwal Developers in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Runwal Developers ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Runwal Developers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.