
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.Tushar Mandlekar
Respondant Advocate Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/11/531. Makarand Harish Pandit24, Shankar NagarNagpurMaharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Pradeshik Parivahav Adhikari...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R I Thanvi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001Revision Petition No. RP/13/12(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/03/2012 in Case No. EA/13/20 of District Nagpur)1. Shri Pankaj Omprakash...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/104/20131. ABDUL RASHEED VALIL HOUSE ALUKKAL POST UGRAPURAM AREAKODEMALAPPURAM DIST...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M GHEETHA CLERK RTO OFFICE MALAPPURAM............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMEDALI K PRESIDENT PRESENT: ORDERBoth party absent. N...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/369/20121. SATHEESH ABRAHAMCHAKKALAYIL,MUTTAMBALAM P.O,KOTTAYAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RTORTO ,KOTTAYAM2. VECHICLE INSPECTORRTO,KOTTAYAM3. SUPDT.,RTORT OFFICE,KOTTAYAM4. RTOINFORMATION OFFICER,RT OFFICE,KO...
Case Number: 369
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NARAYAN R
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/275(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/03/2013 in Case No. 78/2013 of District Idukki)1. ALEYKUTTY JOSEPHMARIPPURATHU HOUSE, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. JOINT ...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate T.V.Vijayan, Hosdurg
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2381. T.Abdul KhaderS/o.Kutti Haji, R/at H.No.17/330, Kulsu Manzil, Arangadi, Kanhangad.Po.KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Joint RTORTO Office, KanhangadKasaragodKerala2. The District CollectorCivil lines,Vidyanagar.Po.KasaragodKerala.......
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/790 1. Makarand Harish PanditNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Pradeshik Parivahav Adhikari, RTONagpur ......
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/789 1. Sagar Girish WasuleNagpurMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Pradeshik Parivahan Adhikari, RTO Of...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/740 1. Dhiraj Domaji GaidhaneNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. RTO Office, NagpurNagpur ...........Respond...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.Vijayakumaran
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/10/263(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/02/2010 in Case No. CC 01/2009 of District Palakkad) 1. The RTO ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Padmanabhan ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE :HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT PRESENT : ORDER KERALA STATE CO...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rto in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rto ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rto under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.