company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1.Shri K. Venkatram Bhatt

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/336/20141. 1.Shri K. Venkatram Bhatt S/o. Govinda BhattAged 70 Years Occ Retired Employee Kalkaje House Post KolnadBantwal Dist D.K Pin Code 574323...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Office Silva ...

Case Number: 336

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1.Shri K Mahabala

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/337/20141. 1.Shri K Mahabala S/o. K. Vasappa DevadigaAged 75 years Occ Retired Employee House No 9.144 NekkermarGorigudd Kankanadi Mangalore 02...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Office Silva Road...

Case Number: 337

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1. Shri Vishwanath Purusha

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/338/20141. 1. Shri Vishwanath Purusha S/o. Krishna PurushaAged 65 Years Occ Retired Employee Near S.V s. Temple Door no 19 25Thyagaraja Road Panemangalore pin 574231...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegi...

Case Number: 338

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1. Shri A. E Kunhiraman

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/339/20141. 1. Shri A. E Kunhiraman S/o. E. ParameshwaranAged 68 years Occ Retired Employee Kajarkatta House Renjilady Village & Post Puttur Taluk Dist D.K............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Offic...

Case Number: 339

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1. Shri B.H. Mohammad

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/340/20141. 1. Shri B.H. Mohammad S/o. Hussain MusaliyarAged 65 years Occ Retired Employee Malenad Manzil Post Guruvayankere Tal Bantwal Dist D.K............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Office Silva Ro...

Case Number: 340

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1.Shri Krishna Kamat

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/341/20141. 1.Shri Krishna Kamat S/o. Ram KamathAged 68 years Occ Retired Employee Parashuram NilayaPost Guruvayankere Beltangadi Taluk Dist D.KPin Code 574 217...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional O...

Case Number: 341

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1. Shri K Koosappagowda

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/342/20141. 1. Shri K Koosappagowda S/o. ShivannagowdaAged 63 years Occ Retired Employee Mathrushree NilayaShekmalai House Ariyadka Post Tal Puttur Dist D.K............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Offi...

Case Number: 342

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1.Shri Henry Lasrado

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/343/20141. 1.Shri Henry Lasrado S/o. Albert LasardoAged 71 Years Occ Retired Employee Peddamale House & Post Mangalore Dist D.K. Pin Code 574194...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Office Silva Roa...

Case Number: 343

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1. Shri I Shivaramagowda

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/344/20141. 1. Shri I Shivaramagowda S/o. SheshappagowdaAged 71 years Occ Retired Employee Bangama Nilaya Nekkraie Marga Kadaka Puttur Dist D.K. pin Code 574220...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional O...

Case Number: 344

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Karnataka

1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S 1.Shri Gopal Shetty

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/345/20141. 1.Shri Gopal Shetty S/o. Ramanna ShettyAged 71 years Occ Retired Employee Bangama Nilaya Nekkraie Marga Kadaka Puttur Dist D.K. pin Code 574220...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Regional Provident Fund CommissionerRegional Office...

Case Number: 345

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.