company-name-logo

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Latest Judgments

Total 2185 Consumer Court Cases Against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

Bihar

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors. V/S Ram Ratan Mahto,

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Patna

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/26/2012( Date of Filing : 18 Jan 2012 )1. Ram Ratan Mahto,S/o- Late Rangu Mahto, R/o- Vill- Barwadih, P.O- Damariya, Distt- Gaya, Bihar,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.Regi...

Case Number: 26

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-12-2021

Karnataka

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Shri. T. Venkataswamy Aged 69 Years Occ, Retired Employee

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Yallappa

Respondant Advocate

Before the 4th Addl District consumer forum, 1st Floor, B.M.T.C, B-Block, T.T.M.C, Building, K.H. Road, Shantinagar, Bengaluru - 560027J.N. Havanur, PresidentComplaint Case No. CC/13/24791. Shri. T. Venkataswamy Aged 69 Years Occ, Retired EmployeeNo. 171 4th A Main 3rd Stage 3rd ...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Karnataka

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Shri. P. S. Ranganatha RaoS/o. P.s. Sreenivas RaoAged about 68 Years Occ;

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Shri. R. P. Koparde

Respondant Advocate

Before the 4th Addl District consumer forum, 1st Floor, B.M.T.C, B-Block, T.T.M.C, Building, K.H. Road, Shantinagar, Bengaluru - 560027J.N. Havanur, PresidentComplaint Case No. CC/13/24791. Shri. T. Venkataswamy Aged 69 Years Occ, Retired EmployeeNo. 171 4th A Main 3rd Stage 3rd ...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Karnataka

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Shri. K.H. Basavarajaiah S/o H. Honnappa

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Before the 4th Addl District consumer forum, 1st Floor, B.M.T.C, B-Block, T.T.M.C, Building, K.H. Road, Shantinagar, Bengaluru - 560027J.N. Havanur, PresidentComplaint Case No. CC/13/24791. Shri. T. Venkataswamy Aged 69 Years Occ, Retired EmployeeNo. 171 4th A Main 3rd Stage 3rd ...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

NCDRC

KANUBHAI HARMANBHAI PATEL V/S REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PREM PRAKASH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3113 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/02/2016 in Appeal No. 576/2015 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERTHROUGH ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, LEGAL EMPLOY...

Case Number: 3113

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2016

Telangana

M. Valsalakumar, V/S The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K. Raghuram Reddy

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. A/114/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/04/2015 in Case No. CC/538/2013 of District Hyderabad-III)1. The Regional Provident Fund CommissionerEmployees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Bhavishya Nidhi Bh...

Case Number: 114

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2016

Kerala

r carlose V/S Regional provident fund commissioner

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate k v karmachandran

Respondant Advocate

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION SISUVIHARLANE VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANATHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.170/15JUDGMENT DATED : 11.11.2016(Appeal filed against the order in CC.No.228/2011 on the file of CDRF,Kozhikkode order dated : 17.12.2014)PRESENTSRI.K.CHANDRADAS NADAR : JUD...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2016

Maharashtra

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIENT FUND ORGANIZATION V/S SHEHERYAR DATTA

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV. MBS. CO,.

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/102/20141. SHEHERYAR DATTAC/201, ATLANTA CO, OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY EVERSHINE NAGAR, MALAD (W), MUMBAI -64MAHARASH...

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2016

Punjab

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Nanak Shah

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Rohit Jain

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 312 Instituted on: 01.03.2016 Decided on: 06.09.2016Nanak Shah aged about 61 years son of Shri Parshotam Shah, resident of Dandhi Nagar, Naudharani Road, Malerkotla, District Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Employ...

Case Number: 312

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2016

Karnataka

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S B.L.Krishna Murthy

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate G.Geetha Bai

Respondant Advocate Sri.AVJ

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/1062/20161. B.L.Krishna MurthyB.L.Krishna Murthy, S/o B.Laxmi Narayana Rao,...

Case Number: 1062

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.