
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VINOD KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1053 of 2015Date of Institution: 09.12.2015Date of Decision : 26.04.2016Manju Sharma w/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Resident of 606, Zinnia Tower, Omex Green Valley, Gurukul Road, Faridabad. Appellant/...
Case Number: 1053
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. N. Lahiri Ms. Srabani De Ghosahal
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/183/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/01/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/232/2013 of District North 24 Parganas)1. M/s. Pratistha Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. Regd....
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ajay Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Execution Application No. EA/24/2015InComplaint Case No. C/2012/751. Mr Harsh SetiaGurgaon...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Mahagun Real Estate Pvt LtdDelhi..............
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BY POST
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.329 of 2015 Date of Institution: 20.03.2015 Date of Decision: 29.03.2016Bhupender Pratap Singh s/o Davinder Singh Rajput, R/o D1-403 The Legend Sector 57, Legend, Gurgaon-122002.…..Appellan...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Dinesh Kumar Kohli Vs M/s SRS Real EstatePresent Shri Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he withdraws the complaint with permission to file a fresh before appropriate Forum/Court of competent jurisdiction. In...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Execution Application No. EA/36/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/371/20141. Robin Murmu Eden City, Block No. D10, Flat No. 603, P.O. Sarangabad via Budge Budge, P...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2016
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/10/82InComplaint Case No. CC/09/5831. Krishnakumar Wamanrao BelsareKhaparkheda, Dist Nagpur...........Appellant(s)Versus1. No...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate V. T. Bhoskar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/499/20151. Smt. Surekha Ramesh JoshiR/o 28, Bajiprabhu Nagar, Nagpur-440015NagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Pawans...
Case Number: 499
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Amod Bhole
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2016
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate D.R.Jindal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/457/20161. Ms. Ashu Gupta & Others1. Ashu Gupta W/o Hemant Singh S/o Subhash Chander2.Naresh Kumar S/o Anand Bhushan3. Mr. Atul S/o Mani Ram.4.Sukhminder Singh S/o Karnail Singh.5.Rajinder Sharma S/o K.K Sharma.6.Ravi Jain S/o Pawan Kumar.7.R...
Case Number: 457
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Real Estate in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Real Estate ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Real Estate under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.