company-name-logo

Punjab Urban Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 95 Consumer Court Cases Against Punjab Urban Development Authority.

Punjab

Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Sanjeev Jain

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Munish Goel

Respondant Advocate

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. Consumer Complaint No.128 of 2017 Date of Institution : 06.03.2017 Order Reserved on : 09.04.2018 Date of Decision : 11.04.2018Sanjeev ...

Case Number: 128

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-04-2018

Punjab

Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) V/S Tarsem Lal

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate S.K.Biriwal

Respondant Advocate Sh N K Sharma, Sh Mukesh Kumar Sh G S Manshia Sh Gurpiar Singh Dhingar

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMANSAPUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/16/2291. Tarsem Lalson of Late Sh. Harbans Lal House No.432, Back Side Dhobi Ghat, Peer Khana, GidderbahaMuktsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA)PUDA Bhawan,...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 18-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-01-2018

Chandigarh

Punjab Urban Development Authority V/S Mr. John T.G.

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. Banni Thomas Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :16/05/2017ORDER Today, none has turned up on behalf of complainant / decree holder. On the last three dates also none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case has been called several times since morning. Accordingly, the application under Section 25 of the Consumer Pro...

Case Number: 47

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2017

Punjab

Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Vivek Sharma

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Krishan Sehajpal

Respondant Advocate

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.477 of 2015 Date of Institution: 05.05.2015 Order Reserved on :12.05.2017 Date of Decision : 15.05.2017Vivek Sha...

Case Number: 477

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-12-2017

NCDRC

HARPAL SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate MS. SHIKHA ROY, MR. AJAY K. SINGH, MR. I.K. KAPILA, MR. SURINDER SINGH & HARKISHAN SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1870 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1609/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/2634/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PATIALA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTR...

Case Number: 1871

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2017

NCDRC

HARPAL SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate MS. SHIKHA ROY, MR. A.K. SINGH, MR. SURINDER SINGH, MR. I.K. KAPILA & MR. HARKISHAN SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1870 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1609/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/2634/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PATIALA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTR...

Case Number: 1870

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2017

NCDRC

MRS. POONAM SINGLA V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. C.K.SUCHARITA

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2871 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 05/03/2005 in Appeal No. 23/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPUDA BHAWAN PHASE VIII MOHALI PUNJAB...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 2871

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2005

|

Date of Upload: 27-05-2016

NCDRC

KAMLESH RANI V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2014 IN RP/1561/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KAMLESH RANI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...

Case Number: 482

|

Date of Filing: 30-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2014

NCDRC

KAMLESH RANI V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. KIRAN KUMAR & MR. KARAN DEWAN & MS. AANCHAL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1561 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 30/05/2013 in Appeal No. 1607/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)PUDA COMPLEX, OPP TEHSIL COMPLEX, JALANDHAR, THROUGH I...

Case Number: 1561

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2014

NCDRC

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANR. V/S BALBIR SINGH

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2013 IN RP/2940/20131. BALBIR SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...

Case Number: 351

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Punjab Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Punjab Urban Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Punjab Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.