Punjab And Sind Bank
Latest Judgments
Total 146 Consumer Court Cases Against Punjab And Sind Bank.
The Punjab and Sind Bank Ltd. V/S Chand Singh
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Gurtaj Sandhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 31Date of Institution : 20.01.2016Date of Decision : 13.05.2016Chand Singh aged 77 years s/o Chet Singh r/o Village Behbal Kalan, Tehsil Jaitu, District Faridkot. .....Complainant VersusThe Punjab & Sind Ban...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2016
Omprakash srivastava V/S Punjab and Sind Bank
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T.J.S. Makkar
Respondant Advocate Self
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/809/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2015 in Case No. C/254/2013 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Punjab and Sind BankKanpur...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 809
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2016
Punjab and Sind Bank V/S Rajinder Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 173 OF 2015in CC/634/2014Rajinder Singh and another Vs Punjab and Sind BankBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Deepak Aggarwal, Counsel for Complain...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
The Manager Punjab and Sind Bank V/S Sukhdev Singh
Court Name: Gurdaspur
Appelant Advocate P.C.Sharmal
Respondant Advocate Sh.Palwinder Singh Boparai, Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPURDISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPURPHONE NO. 01874-245345Complaint Case No. CC/404/20151. Sukhdev SinghS/o Fauja Singh r/o vill. Athwal P.O.Naushehhra Majha Singh Teh and Distt GurdaspurGurdaspurpunjab...........Complainant(s...
Case Number: 404
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
Punjab and Sind Bank V/S Rajinder Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/634/2014Date of Institution:19/09/2014Date of Decision:21/09/20151. Rajinder Singh son of Sh. Surjan Singh;2. Gurpreet Singh son of Sh. Rajinder Singh;Both residents of House No. 232...
Case Number: 634
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2015
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS. V/S M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL
Respondant Advocate MS. KITTU BAJAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 229 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 05/03/2007 in Complaint No. 50/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD.MR. V S MANN 9, ASHOKA PARK EXTENSION DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2013
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS V/S M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL
Respondant Advocate MS. KITTU BAJAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 392 OF 2012 IN FA/229/20071. M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
SIDDAMMALLAPPA V/S PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PALLAV SAXENA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAM PRAKASH GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 521 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 13/11/2006 in Appeal No. 1509/2005 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK147/1, NearGovernment Primary School, Allam Prabhu NagarBidarKarnataka - ...
Case Number: 521
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2012
Punjab and Sind Bank V/S M/s Ram Advertising Services
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. B.B. Bagga,. Adv. for the complainants
Respondant Advocate Sh.I.P.Singh, Adv. for OP
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 83 of 2010 1. M/s Ram Advertising ServicesSCO No. 1112-13, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh through its sole proprietor Shri Pawan Kumar ...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S EGGRO PAPER MOULDS LTD AND OTHERS V/S PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LAJWINDER SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. F.M. DAS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 21/07/2005 in Complaint No. 56/2001 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. PUNJAB AND SIND BANKBRANCH OFFICE , HAZRAT GANJ LUCKNOW -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S EGGRO...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Punjab And Sind Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Punjab And Sind Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Punjab And Sind Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.