
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vivek Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H S Dhandi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/76/2018( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/243/20171. Ms Jasmeet Kaurd/o Sh. Jaswant Singh, H.No. 1599 Sector 18-D, Chandigarh 160018...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma ...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed against the Company, namely, M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited and its Directors under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, to convict them on account of their failure to comply with the judgment/order passed by this Co...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
In view of order having been passed today in the main execution application bearing No.164 of 2018, this application stands disposed of having become infructuous. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 678
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
In view of order having been passed today in the main execution application bearing No.142 of 2018, this application stands disposed of having become infructuous. Certified copy of this order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 677
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate
In view of order having been passed today in the main complaint bearing No.298 of 2018, this application stands disposed of having become infructuous. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.