
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAL DABAS & MR. HARENDERA SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 413 OF 2012 IN RP/1894/20121. PSPCL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DILBAGH SINGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. SURESH CHANDRA...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ATUL SAHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/11/2010 in Appeal No. 888/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PSPCL & ANR.Head Office at:, The MallPatialaPunjab2. A.E.E. PSPCLSub-Division, Sub Urban DirbaSa...
Case Number: 1003
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2012
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ish Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.P.S.Brar and Sh.J.D.Nayyar,O.P.s.
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/11/4391. Rajesh Kumarson of Sh.Vijay Kumar sole prop. M/s Surya Rice Mills,Village Ralla district Mansa............Complainant(s)Versus1. PSP...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Balkaran singh Mann
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.D.Nayyar,O.P.s.
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/11/4741. Narinderpal singh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCL2. SDO/XeN,PSPC Ltd.sub urban sub division,Multania road,Bathinda..............
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.J.S.Walia,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.D.Nayyar,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Execution Application No. EA/11/48 1. Prem Lata ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Sehgal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.P.S.Brar,O.P.s.
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/11/4191. Harjinder Singhaged about 30 years, son of Sh. Mlagar Singh, R/o village Dan Singh Wala, District BathindaBathindaPunjab...........C...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ashok Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh.J.P.S.Brar,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/343 1. Jagdev Singh ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ATUL SAHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 102 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 02/12/2010 in Complaint No. 28/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PSPCL & ANR.hewad office at: The mall, Patialapunjab2. A.S.E/Sr.Xen PSPCL Division, Civil lines Amri...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2011
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate M S Bajwa
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 943 1. Raghubir Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :M S Bajwa, Advocate for For the Respondent :Dated : 30 Sep 2011 ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh. Piara Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 1054 1. Manga Ram ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PSPCL ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 29 Sep 2011 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CO...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.