
Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib
Appelant Advocate Sh jasvir singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FATEHGARH SAHIB. Consumer Complaint No.37 of 2016 Date of institution: 30.03.2016 Date of decision : 06.01.2017Ranjit Singh son of Sh. Buland Singh R/o village Barwali Kalan, Tehsil Khamanon, District Fat...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh Mayank Malhotra
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/16/4771. M/s Shiva Cold Storec/187-188 Focal Point Patiala through its authorized signlatory Manmohan Singh s/o Shri Gulabsinghpatialapunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLthrough its Charimanpa...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate B.K.Menon
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/620/20161. Bahadur SinghS/o Santa Singh R/o Village Chhiniwal Khurd Tehsil TapaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCL1.Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd, The Mall Patiala through its Secretary.2.Assistant Executive Engineer,PSP...
Case Number: 620
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Deepak Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1285/20151. Veena RaniW/o Manjit Chand S/o Prem Chand R/o Dhanaula Kalan Tehsil and District BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCL1.Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd., The Mall, Patiala, through its Secretary/Chairman /...
Case Number: 1285
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2016
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 76Date of Institution : 18.03.2016Date of Decision : 22.11.2016Chet Singh aged about 57 years s/o Sh Ujjagar Singh, r/o Dhanka Basti, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu, District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Power...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Bhushan Kumar Garg
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 348 Instituted on: 06.04.2016 Decided on: 21.11.2016Rajinder Singh aged about 66 years son of Beant Singh, resident of Near City Police Station, Sunam, District Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. S.D.O. (Assist...
Case Number: 348
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Harjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/678/20161. Paramjit Kauraged 55 years W/o Sh. Mohinder Singh R/o Mehal Kalan Proprietor of Mohinder Singh Chand Singh Ice Factory, Mehal KalanBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCL1.Chairman Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd Pa...
Case Number: 678
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2016
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate V.S.Sandhu
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/44/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/1089/20151. Jasvir KaurW/o Jagjit Singh S/o Piara Singh Chiniwal Khurd Tehsil and District BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. PSPCL1.Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, through its Ad...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh Rahul Kamboj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/15/2131. Jagdish Kumar aged 45 years s/o Rajesh r/o House No.7 Rattan Nagar Block F,Tripuri Patialapatialapunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLhead office The Mall Patiala through its Charimanp...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2016
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/689/20151. Dharampal SinghS/o Late Sh. Asha Ram, R/o VPO Devi Nagar, Tehsil Dera bassi, Distt. Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLThe Mall Patiala through its Managing Director.2. PSPCLThe SDO, PSPCL Village Saidpura, tehsil Dera B...
Case Number: 689
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.