company-name-logo

Property


Latest Judgments

Total 424 Consumer Court Cases Against Property.

Tamil Nadu

The Managing Director, Covai Property Center Pvt. Ltd., V/S K. Venkateswaran

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V. Balaji,

Respondant Advocate B.L. Lavanya-R,

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI MEMBERF.A. No.992 / 2011(Against the Order dt.30.08.2011 made in C.C. No.262/2010 on the file ofD.C.D.R.C., C...

Case Number: 992

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2022

Karnataka

M/s Vaikund Property Development Pvt Ltd V/S A.P.Mahesh S/o Late Paramashivaiah,

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate (By Shri/Smt Rajagopala(Rtd) I.P(Mahesh) )

Respondant Advocate (By Shri/Smt I.P(Nathan) )

Case Number: 2584

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-02-2022

Karnataka

Corporate Leisure & Property V/S Genesis Apartment Owners Association

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s BMSP Associates

Respondant Advocate ISD

Case Number: 443

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Property V/S Alka Pandey

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S N singh Gaherwar

Respondant Advocate Anurag Singh

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/35/2015( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2015 )1. Alka PandeyLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal PropertyLucknow............Opp.Party(s) BEF...

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ansal Property &Infrastructure Ltd V/S Gayatri Rastogi

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N Singh Gaherwar

Respondant Advocate Anurag Singh

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/34/2015( Date of Filing : 13 Feb 2015 )1. Gayatri RastogiLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ansal Property &Infrastructure LtdLucknow.......

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2022

Tamil Nadu

M/s.Teak 'n' Oak V/S M/s.Visionation Property Care Pvt.Ltd

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.S.Ramesh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 64

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 07-02-2022

Karnataka

M/s Indiabuild property Developers Pvt Ltd V/S Devadas Viswanath,

Property  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Satish S

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/1144/2020( Date of Filing : 21 Dec 2020 )1. Devadas Viswanath,Aged 53 Years, R/at A 101, Hoysala Habitat, Nagenahalli Road, Harohalli, Yelahanka, Bengaluru 5...

Case Number: 1144

|

Date of Filing: 21-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2021

Maharashtra

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-12-2021

Tamil Nadu

M/s. Sri Renga Property Developers Pvt. Ltd, Rep by its Managing Director R.Rajaharam V/S N.E.Subhramaniyam,

Property  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Lavanya Shankar

Respondant Advocate

IN THE TAMILNADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.BEFORE Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH :: PRESIDENT Tmt. Dr. S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI :: MEMBERC.C. No.03/2015 MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021N.E. Subhramaniyam,S/o. Late N.K. Eswar...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2022

Rajasthan

CHIEF PROPERTY MANAGER RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD V/S SMT. GEETA PARIHAR

Housing Board   Property  

Court Name: Jodhpur

Appelant Advocate DENESH BOHRA

Respondant Advocate M.S. PANWAR

Case Number: 714

|

Date of Filing: 03-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Property in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Property ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Property under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.