company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3649 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

West Bengal

Godrej Properties Limited & Others V/S Mr. Prithu Bhowmik & Another

Godrej   Godrej Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Palash Goswami

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Interlocutory Application No. IA/1145/2019( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/826/20191. Mr. Prithu Bhowmik & AnotherS/o Mr. Dilip Bhaumik, rep. by his wife Urmi B...

Case Number: 1145

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 10-12-2019

West Bengal

Godrej Properties Limited & Others V/S Mr. Prithu Bhowmik & Another

Godrej   Godrej Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Palash Goswami

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Interlocutory Application No. IA/1146/2019( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/826/20191. Mr. Prithu Bhowmik & AnotherS/o Mr. Dilip Bhaumik, rep. by his wife Urmi B...

Case Number: 1146

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 10-12-2019

Delhi

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S SONIKA DEVI

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate DEEPIKA

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :04.12.2019Date of Decision :09.12.2019 COMPLAINT NO.755/2017In the matter of:Smt. Sonika Devi,W/o. Shri Sushil Kumar,R/o. 1318/89, Shanti Nagar,Tri Nagar, Delhi.&hell...

Case Number: 755

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2019

NCDRC

M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. & 8 ORS. V/S SATISH UPGANLAWAR & ANR.

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. ROHIT GUPTA OP-8,9 EX-PARTE VIDE ORDER DATED.16/11/2017

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 706 OF 20171. SATISH UPGANLAWAR & ANR.S/o Sh. B.W. Upganlawar R/o G 1304, Maple Heights, SushantLok, 1st Block C, Gurugram 122009 Haryana 2. Smt. Kiran Upganlawar W/o Sh. Satish Upganlawar R/o G 1304, Mapl...

Case Number: 706

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2019

Haryana

M/S KAPIL PROPERTIES AND OTHERS. V/S PARMOD KUMAR

Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate VIKAS KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.1137 of 2017Date of Institution:20.09.2017Date of decision:25.11.2019Parmod Kumar S/o Sh.Tarif Singh R/o H.No.3, Adehini Village, New Delhi 17.…AppellantVersus1. M/s Kapil. Properties, Village A...

Case Number: 1137

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2019

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Kulwinder Kaur

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Subhash Chand Adv.

Respondant Advocate

MA/942/2019 This application has been filed by the judgment debtors for to stay the coercive process issued by this Commission against the judgment debtors. Let notice of this application be issued to the decree holders. At this stage, Sh. Subhash Chand Bhinder, Advocate has put ...

Case Number: 181

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2019

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Sandeep Sukhija

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Subhash Chand & Amit Wadhwa Adv.

Respondant Advocate

MA/939/2019 In this application, on 18.11.2019, on an undertaking to bring cheques qua the decretal amount today, the coercive process issued against the judgment debtors vide order dated 17.10.2019 in Execution Application bearing No.203 of 2019 was kept in abeyance till today. ...

Case Number: 203

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2019

Chandigarh

The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Mr. Tarun Gupta

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Inderpal Singh Bhinder, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

MA/873/2019 In this application, vide order dated 1.11.2019, on payment of an amount of Rs.2,00,000/-, the coercive process issued against judgment debtors No.1 to 3 was kept in abeyance uptil today. To be decided alongwith main execution application bearing No.281 of 2018, list...

Case Number: 281

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2019

Chandigarh

The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Ms Priyanka Singh

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Inderpal Singh Bhinder Adv.

Respondant Advocate

MA/918/2019 In this application, on 15.11.2019, on part payment of the decretal amount, the coercive process issued against the judgment debtors vide order dated 04.11.2019 in Execution Application bearing No.353 of 2019 was kept in abeyance till today. However, the main executio...

Case Number: 353

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2019

Chandigarh

Mr. Sushil Ansal, Chairman of M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Mr Lovekesh Kathuria

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Inderpal Singh Bhinder

Respondant Advocate

MA/871/2019 Reply to the application not filed. To be decided alongwith main execution application bearing No.354 of 2018, listed for today.EA/354/2018 As per report received from the police officials, Sh. Sushil Anal, Chairman and Sh. Pranav Ansal, Managing Director of M/s Ansal...

Case Number: 354

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.