company-name-logo

Properties

Latest Judgments

Total 3649 Consumer Court Cases Against Properties.

NCDRC

ARAVIND V/S BCIL ZED RIA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

Properties  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. V. BALAJI ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 591 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 11/10/2022 in Complaint No. 16/2019 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. BCIL ZED RIA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ANR.NO.37/1-1, AGA ABBAS ALI ROAD,BANGALORE-560 0422. BCIL Z...

Case Number: 591

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2023

|

Date of Upload: 12-02-2024

Karnataka

1. M/s. Sriven Properties V/S Smt. Asha V

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate Padmanaba Law Chamber

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 80

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2024

Maharashtra

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2024

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2024

Karnataka

ITTINA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. V/S SEEMA RANJAN, RAMESH KUMAR RAUNIAR

Properties  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Party in person

Respondant Advocate

Before the 4th Addl District consumer forum, 1st Floor, B.M.T.C, B-Block, T.T.M.C, Building, K.H. Road, Shantinagar, Bengaluru - 560027S.L.Patil, PresidentExecution Application No. EA/101/2023( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/11/16001. SEEMA RANJAN, RAMESH K...

Case Number: 101

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2023

|

Date of Upload: 01-02-2024

Madhya Pradesh

Khanna Properties & Infrastructures Pvt Ltd V/S Amika Prashad Patel

Properties  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate Arun Jain

Respondant Advocate Rakesh Sagar

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2024

Chandigarh

M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Amit Gupta

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Rachit Kaushal adv

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:133/2021Date of Institution:24.02.2021Date of Decision:23.01.2024Amit Gupta s/o Sh.Sham Sunder Gupta r/o H.No.95-A, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, J&K currently r/o 2/3 Ascort Court, Glen Waverly, V...

Case Number: 133

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2024

Chandigarh

M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Lt. Col. Jagmohan Singh Bhabra

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv. Rachit Kaushal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:430/2022Date of Institution:17.05.2022Date of Decision:23.01.2024Lt. Col. Jagmohan Singh Bhabra,s/o Sh. Khajan Singh Bhabra, Resident of House No.C-1/296, Sector-H,LDA Colony, Kanpur Road, Luc...

Case Number: 430

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2024

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. acompany incorportaed under the Companies Act, 1956 having it V/S Arundeep Sandhu

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv. Rachit Kaushal & Divya Khanna

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:677/2020Date of Institution:14.12.2020Date of Decision:23.01.2024Arundeep Sandhu S/o Sh. T. S. Sandhu, H. No. 129, Aravali Apartments, Alakhnanda, New Delhi Currently Permanent resident of H. ...

Case Number: 677

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2024

Chandigarh

Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Sandeep Mohla

Ansal Properties   Properties  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv. Navneet Jindal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:782/2021Date of Institution:02.11.2021Date of Decision:23.01.20241. Sandeep Mohla S/o Sh. S. C. Mohla aged about 51 Years, and2. Niti Mohla W/o Sandeep Mohla, aged about 50 yearsBoth R/o A-110...

Case Number: 782

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2021

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2024

Chhattisgarh

M/s Sai Prasad Properties Ltd. V/S Shyam Lal Jangde

Properties  

Court Name: Raipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Sanjeev Banjare

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-02-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Properties in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Properties ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Properties under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.