
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1563 OF 2015(Arising out of order dated 01.12.2015 passed in Execution Case No.36/2014 by District Commission, Jabalpur)1. SMT. JIGNA BHATIA, D/O LATE SHRI YASHWANT KUMAR BHATIA, ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2023
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/366/20141. SECRETARY,RAMANATTUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATRAMANATTUKARA PO-673633...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s TRANS ASIA TELE SYSTEMSKANCHAS BUILDING,Near NEW BUS STAND,RAJAJI ROAD,KOZHIKODE-42. MUHAM...
Case Number: 366
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nakul Sharma
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1455 of 2011 Date of Institution: 27.09.2011 Date of Decision : 11.02.2015Gram Panchayat Village Chugha, Tehsil Jalalab...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2015
Court Name: Nayagarh
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKHANDAPARA ROAD, NAYAGARH, ODISHA 752069Execution Application No. EA/10/2013InCC/51/20121. Pitabas Behera Dankari Sahi , Rasanga, Gania, Nayagarh BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAM CHANDRA DAS PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SARITA TRIPATHY MEMBERHON'BLE MR. B...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/286/20141. V.T.MUHAMMEDVADAKKE THODUKAYIL (H), PARANNOOR(PO), NARIKKUNI(via)KOZHIKODE-673585...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NARIKKUNI PANCHAYAT AKSHAYA UNITNear GOVT. HOSPITAL, NARIKKUNI............O...
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Aligarh
Appelant Advocate MR PRABHU DAYAL SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
न्यायलय जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष फोरमअलीगढComplaint Case No. CC/95/20141. GRAM PANCHAYAT QUARSI THROUGH PRADHANBLOCK LODHA TEHSIL KOIL DISTT ALIGARH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SURYA EL...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Katni
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate DEVENDRA DUBEY
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KATNINEAR DUGRI NALA , COLLECTORATE ROAD , KATNI(MP)LIST FOR FINAL ORDER CASESComplaint Case No. CC/84/20141. VINOD TRIPATHIKATNI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GRAM PANCHAYAT KAILWARA KHURD & OTHERS.KATNI............Opp.Party(s) BEFOR...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT S. AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3590 OF 2014(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Maharastra)1. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI MORSHI & ANR............Petitioner(s)Versus1. KANCHANRAO GANPAT...
Case Number: 3590
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. PAARI VENDHAN, MR. SETHU MAHENDRAN & MS. ARUNIMA PAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3974 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 14/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1073/2011 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. PRESIDENT, AUTHIVILLAI VILLAGE PANCHAYAT & ANR.Anthoniyar Vattham, Thiruvithancode and Post...
Case Number: 3974
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2014
Court Name: Vizianagaram
Appelant Advocate S N M RAJU
Respondant Advocate K PHALGUNA RAO
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM- VIZIANAGARAM(UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986)Complaint Case No. CC/31/20131. SOBHA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYVZM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. EXWCUTIVE OFFICER,JAMI PANCHAYATVZM............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panchayat in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panchayat ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panchayat under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.