
Court Name: Gurdaspur
Appelant Advocate Sh.B.S. Thakur and Sh.S.S.Thakur, Advs.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Kumar, Adv. for OPs.
...
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate G.C.Khurana OP No.1,Pardeep Rathore Op No.2
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 378 of 2011. Date of institution: 21.04.2011 Date of decision: 29.03.2017Vinod Bala, aged about 54 years, wife of Shri Pawan Kumar, resident of VPO Gumthala Rao, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Ya...
Case Number: 378
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N N Pandey
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2119(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. U P Avas Vikas Parishad a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Oriental ...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2017
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Jiwan Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/17/391. Rajwinder SinghVillage Sangera teh & Disttbathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Oriental Bank of CommerceBathi...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ritesh Singla
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/3651. Mittar Sainson of Gopi Ram r/o H.No.B-28/41,Janta colony rampura phul, tehsil phulc/o sigla tea industries near R...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Ajaydeep Singh
Respondant Advocate RK Gupta
BEFORE THE DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM YAMUNA NAGAR JAGADHRI Complaint No. 60 of 2011. Date of Instt. 25.01.2011 Date of Decision:02.02.2017.Rajesh Kalra aged about 32 years son of Madan Lal Kalra, Resident of C/2, 1170 Mahavir Colony, Hanuman Gate, Jagadhri, ...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Bhanwar Singh
Respondant Advocate Rajiv Gupta
BEFORE THE DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM YAMUNA NAGAR JAGADHRI Complaint No. 137 of 2013. Date of Institution: 18.02.2013. Date of Decision: 14.12.2016Sanjeev Kumar aged about 26 years son of Sh. Kamal Kishore, resident of House No. 718/A, Near FIC Godown, Durga ...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Hsbc Oriental Bank Of Commerce
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
Respondant Advocate MR. SUTRYA PRAKASH GANDHI & MR. AMIT GANDHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1208 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/12/2013 in Appeal No. 1550/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. CANARA HSBC ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.(THROUGH ITS MANAGER-LEGAL & CO...
Case Number: 1208
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Suresh Khanna
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.202 of 2015 Date of instt.: 04.09.2015 Date of decision:9.12.2016Suraj Bhan son of Shri Daya Nand resident of village Daulatpur P.O. Chjiroa Tehsil and District Karnal. ……..Complainant. V...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: South West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VIIGOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHILOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, SHEIKH SARAI, NEW DELHI-110017Complaint No. DF. VII/283/16 Dated :In the matter of :Prem SinghH.No. R. Z M 40 Gali No. 3,Vijay Enclave,New Delhi-110045 ….ComplainantVersusOriental Bank ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Oriental Bank Of Commerce in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Oriental Bank Of Commerce ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Oriental Bank Of Commerce under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.