
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, four demand drafts bearing No.030890 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/-, 030891 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, 030892 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/- & 030893 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, totaling Rs.23,37...
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1051 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 25/04/2018 in Complaint No. 768/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. OMAXE LIMITEDOMAXE DEVELOPERS PV TLTD, INIDA TRADE TOWER, 1 FLOOR, BADDI KURALI ROAD, NEW CHAN...
Case Number: 1051
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the Opposite Parties not filed. The Opposite Parties moved an application bearing No.496 of 2018 stating that the total value of the relief claimed by the complainant would come to Rs.1 crore and as such, this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to t...
Case Number: 196
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the judgment debtors and not controverted by Sh. Sunil Kamboj, brother of Ms. Simran Kamboj, decree holder/complainant that an amount of Rs.19,19,795/- was transferred in the account of the decree holder/complainant by the judgment d...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek Bhateja
Respondant Advocate
Punjab State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Dakshan Marg, Sector 37-A , ChandigarhExecution Application No. EA/204/2018( Date of Filing : 01 Jun 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/381/20171. Sunayana Pawa D/o Sh. R.P.Chhabra, r/o H.No. 5844, Modern Housing Complex, ...........A...
Case Number: 204
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Jagan Nath Bhandari
Respondant Advocate
Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 68 OF 2018KanwalPreet Singh & anr. Vs M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURESH KUMAR SARDANA...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
During arguments, it is stated that the matter has been settled. Copy of settlement deed has been placed on record. Noting above facts, Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant states that this complaint be dismissed as withdrawn having been settled between the p...
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, to satisfy the claim raised by the decree holder, Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over two cheques bearing Nos.208478 dated 21.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.6 Lakhs and 208479 dated 22.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,98,042/- to Sh....
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Execution Application No.:EA/64/2015Date of Institution: 27/04/2015Date of Decision: 27/08/20181. Vivek Jain son of Sh.Junninder Kumar Jain r/o House No.3228/1, Sec-40-D, Chandigarh.2. Raman Jain (mother of co...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amandeep Singh Nirmaan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per Buyer’s Agreement dated 06.07.2012, the opposite party committed to hand over possession of the unit (flat), in question, on or before 03.07.2015. The possession has not been delivered till today. Counsel for the opposite party states that possession is likely to be ...
Case Number: 732
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.