
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate G.K. Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA. Complaint case no. : 347 of 2021 Date of Institution : 11.11.2021 Date of decision : 03.10.2022.Sandeep Virk aged about 38 years s/o Jagjiwan Pal Singh, R/o 275, Sector-C, Defence Colony, Ambala Cantt. &hell...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NAREN PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Date of Instituion:15.09.2017 Date of final hearing:30.09.2022 Date of pronouncement: 30.11.2022Consumer Complaint No.574 of 2017IN THE MATTER OFShyama Yadav w/o Sh. Shri Rajinder Singh Yadav, resident of VPO Badhah...
Case Number: 574
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.400 of 2018 Date of Institution: 03.04.2018 Date of Final Hearing: 27.09.2022Date of pronouncement: 20.12.2022Omaxe Ltd., Corporate Office-Omaxe House-7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi ...
Case Number: 400
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2023
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Naresh Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/197( Date of Filing : 23 Apr 2019 )1. Pushpa Devi,Age 39 years W/o Sh. Ram Kishan Ahlawat R/o H.No. 3511/2445, Main Bus Stand, Beri Road, Dighal, District Jhajjar............Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2022
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sunil Kuamr Sinha,
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/379/2022( Date of Filing : 02 Sep 2022 )1. Smt. Rani Debey,W/o- Dr. Nagendra Kumar Dubey, R/o- K-80, P.C Colony, Hanuman Nagar, P.S- Patrakar Nagar, Patna-20Patna, Bihar, ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe India Trade ...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2022
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ZEUS LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 297 OF 20181. M.M. GOYAL & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. OMAXE FOREST SPA AND HILLS DEVELOPERS LIMITED (FORMERLY: OMAXE AZORIM DEVELOPERS LTD.)(Formerly:Omaze Azorim Developers Ltd.) Site Office, F...
Case Number: 297
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2022
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/552/2012( Date of Filing : 26 Nov 2012 )1. Rajesh K R EC No.2658 QA STD Room Hero Motor Sec 33.34 Delhi Jaipur haihway Gurgaon Haryana ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 Local Shopping Center...
Case Number: 552
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES & DR. DEEPAK JINDAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 264 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 04/10/2018 in Complaint No. 109/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. MANAGING DIRECTOR , OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.ZONAL OFFICE INDIA TRA...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2022
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Inderjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate
Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/488/2021( Date of Filing : 22 Sep 2021 )1. Ravinder Sethi S/o Surjit Singh SethiFlate No. 102...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Limited & OthersOmaxe H. 7............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PRESENT:Dated...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. AMARJEET SINGH & NARENDER YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 668 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 14/11/2017 in Complaint No. 196/2017 of the State Commission Punjab)1. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA TRADE TOW...
Case Number: 668
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.