
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURCC NO. 48 Of 20121. M.MadhusoodananAkkali House,P.o.Neerveli 670 701Kannur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Care Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.SP Infocity, Industrial Plot 243, Udyog Vihar, Phase 1, Dundahara, Gurgaon, Hariyana2. Pr...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaCC NO. 62 Of 20121. raginth rajan santha ;udayagiri;115 vikas nagar ;pattathanam kollam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. nokia india pvt ltd;sp infocity industrial plot 243;udyog vihar ;phase 1 dundhahera ;gurgon haryana...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 49 of 2012 1. Vijay Chinraman SonawaneC-2 IMTECH Quarters, Sector-39/A Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 23 Mar 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DI...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/1/2012( Date of Filing : 22 Dec 2011 )1. K.Adhokshaja KumarBantwal D.K............Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia Telecom SetThamil Nadu............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: For the Com...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURCC NO. 306 Of 20111. Siyad PK.Sainaba Manzil, OP Kurichiyil, Thalassery, KannurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia Care Apasons Mobile Gallery, First Floor, Shabeena Complex, Opp.Sunitha Furniture, Thavakkar Road, Kannur K...
Case Number: 306
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate GEORGE CHERIAN
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/5531. ELIZABETH SEBASTAIND/O SEBASTAIN KURIAN, HB-57, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-682 036, REP. BY FATHER AND AUTHORIZED PERSON SEBASTAIN KURIAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTDNOKIA TELECOM SEZ, SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL PARK, PHASE -III, A...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Manjit Kumar Dhamija
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/11/5031. Suresh KumarS/o Bhup Singh, r/o Basti No. 1, Bir Talab, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia Service Private Ltd.Plot No....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 20 Of 20121. Ashraf. C.V.Cheruvath House, Panamaram Post.Wayanad.Kerala............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor, Nokia care Centre.WMO Building,Kalpetta.Wayanad.Kerala.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE MR. K GHEEVARGHESE PRESIDENTHONORABLE MRS. SAJI MATHEW...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate JASPREET sINGH
Respondant Advocate Sh.Manjit Dhamija,O.P.No.3.
Complaint Case No. CC/11/3331. Amarjit singhson of Harcharan singh r/o gali no.13,Ajit road, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia Service pvt.ltd.plot no.IT-c6,seboz square ,3rd floor it park sector 67,Mohali chandigarh2. Dabvindera Music houseBibi wala chowk,Bathinda3...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 21 of 2012 1. Amrinder Singhson of Bhajan Singh R/o Chaudi gali Tehsil Budlada Distt. Mansa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nokia IndiaPvt.Ltd. S.T. Infocity Industrial Plot No. 243 UdyogVohar Phase-1 Ganda Hira Gurgaon Ha...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.