
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/168/2014InComplaint Case No. CC/72/20131. Dr Amarjot R/o Kothi No: 718-c, Urban Estate Phase II...........Appellant(s...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2016
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/1871. Vijayan SPeroorkada,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia solution Network IndiaDLF Cyber city,Gurgoan............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2016
Court Name: Ajmer
Appelant Advocate ADV. SMT. SHANTI JAIN
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/12/20151. ROHIT JAINAJMER...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NOKIA INDIAAJMER............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Vinay Kumar Goswami PRESIDENT Naveen Kumar MEMBER Jyoti Dosi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERजिला मं...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2016
Court Name: Una
Appelant Advocate Sh. Amit Sharma
Respondant Advocate already exparte
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNADISTRICT UNA (HP).Complaint Case No. 115/2013(Hmr)1. Vikas ChandelS/o. Sh. Rajinder Singh, R/o. Vill. & PO Jahu, Teh. Bhoranj Distt. Hamirpur(HP) 177001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia IndiaPvt. Ltd, 4F Tower A & B ,...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
Court Name: Thiruvallur
Appelant Advocate S.Kannan
Respondant Advocate -
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTHIRUVALLURNo.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,THIRUVALLUR-602 001Complaint Case No. CC/3/20151. Tmt.Sujatha RajinikanthPlot No.32/B, Kanakambaram Street, R.R.Nagar, Kovilpathagai, Avadi, Chennai-600062 ThiruvallurTamilnadu............
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2016
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/277/20141. MOHIT KUMAR SHARMAH.NO-637, VILLAGE SADARPUR GHAZIABADGHAZIABADUTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NOKIA SERVICE CENTRED-7, RAJNAGAR DISTRICT CENTRE GHAZIABAD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI HARPA...
Case Number: 277
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv. R.D.Ajbole
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/10/234(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/01/2010 in Case No. cc/09/166 of District Nagpur)1. Dr.Abdul Hameed Jamal S/D Abdul Majeed,R/o. NIT plot No. 48, Sindiban, Tajabad , Nagpur.......
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate स्वतः
Respondant Advocate N.C. Gupte
जिल्हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, ठाणे .Complaint Case No. CC/09/2541. श्री अजित के लिलानीबॅरेक नं 137/12 रुम नं 2 साधुबेला स्कुल अ�...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
CC No.194 of 2015Sumit Maan Vs. NokiaPresent: None for complainant. Ops exparte. Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance. Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M. Sd/- ...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/851. Sanjay ChaudharyFalt 2D, 2nd Floor, 86/A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata-7000174.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.