
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vaibhav Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :07/10/2016ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP-1. Sh. Amandeep Singh, counsel for the OP-1 has made the following statement, recorded separately: - The OP-1 offers to pay Rs.19,000/- (Rs.15000/- as invoice price plus Rs.4000/- as cost of litigation) to the comp...
Case Number: 697
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :06/10/2016ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP-1. Sh. Amandeep Singh, counsel for the OP-1 has made the following statement, recorded separately: - The OP-1 offers to pay Rs.11,000/- (Rs.8600/- as invoice price plus Rs.2400/- as cost of litigation) to the compl...
Case Number: 633
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/16/2401. ANSAL ALIYARPADATHAN,VEMBILLY PIN-683565...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SERVICE MANAGER MICROMAX SERVICE CENTREIST FLOOR,KOCHANETH BUILDING,JANATHA JUNCTION,BANERJI ROAD,PALARIVATTOM,ERNAKULAM-6...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, EAST, Govt of NCT Delhi CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, 1st FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI 110092 Consumer complaint no. 63 / 2014 Date of Institution 16/01/2014 Order Reserved on 4/10/2016 Date of Order 5/10/2016 In matter ofMr Kapi...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2017
Court Name: Alappuzha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHAPazhaveedu P.O., AlappuzhaComplaint Case No. CC/376/20151. Gopakumar S/O Radhakrishnan Polakkulam Sanathanapuram.P.O Alappuzha-688 003 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Micromax Micromax house,90B, Sector-18 Gurgaon,Pin-122015 2....
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2016
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/4511. M Vijayankavalotekonam,puthevettu mele,perukavu,tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Micromax21/14A phase2,narina,Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2016
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/5321. Binu STvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MicromaxTvpm............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. R.Sathi MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. Lij...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/42/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/13/7761. Raj Singha MahatoS/o Shri Phanindranath Mahato, Qtr. No. 5, Type - II, Kendriy...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Kuldeep Singh Mittal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 18 Date of Institution : 12.01.2016Date of Decision : 20.09.2016Davinder Kumar s/o Sh Janak Raj r/o Mansa at present residing at Dod Mohalla, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu and District Faridkot. .....ComplainantVersusMicr...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh Baldev Raj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/275/20161. Ajay Kumar S/o Satnam R/o Village Chuharwali JalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Micromax Ltd.21...
Case Number: 275
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Micromax in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Micromax ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Micromax under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.