
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Mr.R.Das, Miss.P.Ghosh
Respondant Advocate
Learned Advocate for the O.P. No.3 is present.The complainant has not taken any step.Record shows that for the last 8 dates the complainant remained absent. The conduct of the complainant shows that he is not at all interested in pursuing with the case. Hence, we ordered that the...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2019
Court Name: Unakoti
Appelant Advocate S. C. Deb, M. Datta, S. Choudhury
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNORTH TRIPURA, KAILASHAHAR.Execution Application No. EA/18/1( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/16/71. Suman ChakrabortyS/O- Sri Ruhini Kumar Chakraborty, Algapur, P.O & P.S- Dharmanagar, North Tripura...........Appell...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2019
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92NATIONAL MONTHLY LOK ADALAT09.03.2019 (2nd Saturday)CC. no.112/17Mr. SHAYAM SARAN DUBEY vs. MICROMAX ORDER Case was taken up in Lok Adalat. The case has been ...
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2019
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92NATIONAL MONTHLY LOK ADALAT09.03.2019 (2nd Saturday)CC. no.385/17Mr. KUNDAN KUMAR vs. THE MOBILE CARE & ANR.ORDER Case was taken up in Lok Adalat. The cas...
Case Number: 385
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2019
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92NATIONAL MONTHLY LOK ADALAT09.03.2019 (2nd Saturday)CC. no. 06/18Ms. RICHA KUMARI vs. MICROMAX ORDER Case was taken up in Lok Adalat. The case has been settle...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Chahal
Respondant Advocate Sh. Piyush Sharma
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/18/317( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 2018 )1. Anita MalikAnita Malik D/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o H.No. 253 Sector 13-17 Panipat Now present at H.No. 875/10 Gali No. 14 14 Ram Gopal Colony Rohtak. .....
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/510/2015( Date of Filing : 07 May 2015 )1. DHIREN1486-E,RANI BAGH,MAIN SANTNAGAR ROAD DLEHI-35...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MICR...
Case Number: 510
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/862/2014( Date of Filing : 28 Jul 2014 )1. MUKESH VERMAH.NO.1,GALI NO.6,WAZIRABAD VILLAGE,DELHI-1100084...........Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 862
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/898/2016( Date of Filing : 14 Sep 2016 )1. ALKA ASWALC-2/190,SEC-17,ROHINI,DELHI-110089...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MICROMAX HO...
Case Number: 898
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/85/2018( Date of Filing : 17 Sep 2018 )1. G.SreepathiS/o Late H.Ganapathi Pandith ,A/a 56 years,R/o Sri.Ramashraya,4th Main Road,Shivamookambika Nagara,S.S.Puram Post,Tum...
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Micromax in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Micromax ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Micromax under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.