company-name-logo

Maxworth Realty

Latest Judgments

Total 372 Consumer Court Cases Against Maxworth Realty.

Karnataka

M/s. Maxworth Realty India Limited, V/S Mr. Shrishail Patil,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. H Pavana

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/559/2021( Date of Filing : 23 Nov 2021 )1. Mr. Shrishail Patil,Aged about 38 Years, S/o. Muragesh Gowda, Residing at No.8812, 2nd Floor, Salim Building, M.S ...

Case Number: 559

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2021

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2022

Karnataka

SMT. K.P Shashank W/o. Kishor Kumar V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1825

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Sri. Parameswara H.V S/o. Lat Veerabhadrappa Kishor Kumar V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1824

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Sri. Shantha Raj S/o. N Veerabhadrappa aged about 40 years , V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1826

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Sri. Naveen Kumar R s/o. Raja Gopal Rao Kishor Kumar V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1827

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

SMT.K.PTEJASSHWINI D/o. Kishor Kumar aged about 26years , V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1828

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

SMT. Padmaja Kishor w/o. Kishor Kumar aged about 47years , V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1830

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Smt, Nandan M Goudar S/o M H Goudar V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1831

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Smt, Bhagya M Goudar D/o M H Goudar V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K V Associates

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by VI Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.34/2020 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commis...

Case Number: 1832

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Karnataka

Sweety Thakur Jha V/S M/s Maxworth Realty India Limited,

Maxworth Realty  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate KV Subramani

Respondant Advocate

05/11/2022 The appellant preferred this appeal against order passed by I Additional Bangalore Urban District Commission in E.P.No.47/2021 which issued NBW against Jdr. and submits that this Jdr. is regularly paying decretal amount to the Dhrs. Inspite of that the District Commiss...

Case Number: 230

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Maxworth Realty in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Maxworth Realty ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Maxworth Realty under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.