Matrix
Latest Judgments
Total 219 Consumer Court Cases Against Matrix.
Matrix Cellular V/S Veena Goyal
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 776 of 2010 1. Veena Goyalwife of Sh. Rajesh Goyal R/o Houise No. 2622 Sector-22/C, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Matrix Cellular(International) Servces Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.45 Apex Motors 1st Floor Industrial Ar...
Case Number: 776
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Proprietor Sen Automobiles (Dealer) Matrix E-Bike V/S PRODIP KUMAR DUBEY
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sundeep Kedia, Proprietor of Matrix V/S ANIL DAS
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE MATRIX INFOTECH PARADIGMS. V/S KARUNAKARAN.K
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 220 Of 20111. KARUNAKARAN.KKUNIYIL[H], CHELANNUR[PO], KOZHIKODE 673616............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MATRIX INFOTECH PARADIGMS.29/698 - A1, A2, A3 & A4, JUBILEE BUILDING, PARAYANCHERY, MAVOOR ROAD, CALICUT 673016.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yad...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Matrix Cellular AInternational Services Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mohinder Kumar Nandwani
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rohit Kumar
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 598 of 2009 1. Mohinder Kumar NandwaniS/o Late Sh. Kesho Ram Nandwani, H.No. 925, Sector 8, Panchkula Haryana ...........Appellan...
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GURVIN SINGH V/S MATRIX CELLULAR (INTERNATIONAL) SERVICES PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGAL KNIGHTS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 364 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/10/2009 in Appeal No. 147/2009 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. MATRIX CELLULAR (INTERNATIONAL) SERVICES PVT. LTD.House No. 233, 1st Floor, Sector - 11Chandi...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2010
MATRIX INFOTEC V/S VISHNUDSAS AMBALI
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CIVIL STATIONconsumer case(CC) No. 421/2006 VISHNUDSAS AMBALI ...........Appellant(s)Vs.MATRIX INFOTEC ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): OppositeParty/Respondent(s): OppositeParty/Respondent(s): Opposite...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.S Auto Matrix V/S Ramesh Achar
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/13/2008( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2008 )1. Ramesh AcharS/o Rudra achar Rajiv Nilaya Fisheries road Beejady Koteshwara Kundapur ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M.S Auto Matrix A...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2019
Matrix Facility Cards Ltd. V/S Sanjay Agarwal
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/151/2007( Date of Filing : 15 May 2007 )1. Sanjay Agarwal2/60, Netaji Nagar, P.S. - Tollygunge, Kolkata - 700092...........
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Matrix in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Matrix ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Matrix under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.