
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SIGHANIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 29/12/2016 in Appeal No. 62/2016 of the State Commission Punjab)1. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.FORMERLY KHOWN AS MARUTI UGYOG LTD., THROUGH MR. SURENDER KUMAR ADVISOR L...
Case Number: 1723
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
Present: Sh. Ajay Kumar Bahl, Appellant in person. After some arguments appellant states that he is not interested in pursuing the present appeal and be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to avail appropriate remedy at appropriate Forum in accordance with the law. In vie...
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Anupam Bhanot Adv. & Brijesh Nandan Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sahil Abhi,AdvDevinder Kumar,Adv
The counsel for OP No.2 states at bar that OP No.2 is agreed to replace the bumper in question and further to give warranty of 6 months for the same. The counsel for the complainant is agreed to the same and wants to withdraw the complaint in view of the statement made at bar by ...
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2017
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Prosenjit Das
Respondant Advocate
O.P files hazira. Complainant by filing a petition stated that he will not want to proceed with the case further as the allegations raised in the case was amicably settled between the parties. Complainant himself is present in the Forum and prayed for dismissal of the case. Hence...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2017
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate ADV. AMIT J. PAI
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/77/20171. ARUN DAMODAR DHONER/AT A/704,GIRIRAJ HORIZON,PLTO NO.43 A&B,44/B,SECTOR-20,KHARGHAR,PANVEL-410210.............
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2017
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate Mr.V.Venkatesan
Respondant Advocate Mr.Baptiste Augustin - OP1 & 2, Mr.Sivasankaran - OP 3 & 4
Final Order1Final Order2Complaint Case No. CC/42/20151. A. Aruoumougame S/o ArikirhsnnaNo.2, New street, Pavazha Nagar, Puducherry - 5PuducherryPuducherry...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Maruti suzuki India Ltd. & 3 othersPalam Gurgaon Road, Gurgaon, Haryana and 3 Others2. ...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2017
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate Girija Prasad Das
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM166 Nivedita Pally, Muchipara, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,Dist Burdwan - 713103Complaint Case No. CC/2/20171. Sri Ajay Mallik1 of 28 Srinagar Pally ,Benachity ,P.S Durgapur 13BurdwanWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti Suzuki...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. P.R. Bakshi. Mr. R. K. Jha.
Respondant Advocate In-Person.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/94/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/09/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/99/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.Regional Office at...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate R.S SAINI
Respondant Advocate Keshav Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No. : 190 of 2013 Date of Institution : 01-08-2013 Date of Decision : 24-05-2017Shailender Khanna son of Sh. Jai Dev, 105, The mall, Ambala Cantt.……Complainant.Versus1. The Managing Direc...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. P. R. Bakshi , Mr. R.K. Jha
Respondant Advocate Mr. Aloke Mukhopadhyay, Ms. Tanusree Dhar.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/1015/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/05/2016 in Case No. CC/385/2010 of District Kolkata-I(North))1. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.Jeevan Prakash, 11th Floor, 25, Kastu...
Case Number: 1015
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Maruti Suzuki in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Maruti Suzuki ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Maruti Suzuki under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.