
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate Y Krishna Kishore
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/10/301. M Hari KrishnaS/O. SUBBARAO 7-17-316/13, 7/7 Srinagar GunturGunturANDHRA PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manappuram Central Finanace & Leasing Ltd, AND ANOTHERV/104,Manappuram House Valappad, Thrissur-...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.Padmini
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/10/41(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/10/2009 in Case No. CC 82/08 of District Palakkad)1. Manappuram General Finance Co. Ltd.Valappad, Thrissur...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Moidin Muthu2/559, Kalathil Veedu, Sreekrishnapuram, Ottappalam Taluk, Palakkad............
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate P.C. GIRISH
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATIONComplaint Case No. CC/08/154 1. MOOSA, S/O AHAMMED KUTTY189, KUTTASSERI HOUSE, MARUTHA-PO, VAZHIKKADAVU, NILAMBUR- 679 333MALAPPURAMKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. MANAGER, MANAPPURAM GENERAL FINANCE AND LEESING LTD.(...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate S.Nazeer
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station,KollamComplaint Case No. CC/09/150 1. Xavior,Vettiyil Puthan Veedu,Nanthirikkal, Kundara and otherKollamKerala2. Bindhu,Vettiyil Puthan Veedu,Nanthirikkal,KundaraKollamKollamKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Manappuram General ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.jayakrishnan
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/10/297(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/04/2010 in Case No. cc/08/470 of District Ernakulam) 1. Lals/o ramakrishnan,lal nivas,vengallor,thodupuzhaidukkikerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Manappuram general finance and leasing ltd and anotheropp.private bus stan...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.Padmini
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/10/39(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/11/2008 in Case No. CC 134/07 of District Thiruvananthapuram) 1. Manappuram Financial Services ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Santhosh Kumar.M.S ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE : SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN PRESIDING MEMBER SRI...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J.S.Ashok Kumar
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/09/658(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/07/2009 in Case No. CC 06/09 of District Wayanad) 1. Manappuram General Finance& Leasing Ltd.Kerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Gopalakrishnan NairKerala ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE :HONORABLE SRI.M.V.VISWANATHAN PRES...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate K.K. Vijayakumaran
Respondant Advocate V.R. Ramachandran
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAyyanthole , Thrissurconsumer case(CC) No. CC/06/919 P. Ismail ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Manappuram Chits India Ltd.Branch Manager ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S. 3. Sasidharan M.S Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):1...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate MUHAMMED HANEEF
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CIVIL STATIONconsumer case(CC) No. 380/2006 P.PRAKASH P.BHARGAVI AMMAP.SREEDHARAN NAIR ...........Appellant(s)Vs.MANAGER,M/S MANAPPURAM CHITE INDIA LTD BRNACH MANAGER,M/S MANAPPURAM CHITS INDIA LTD ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. G Ya...
Case Number: 380
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Coimbatore
Appelant Advocate S.Raveendran
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Manappuram in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Manappuram ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Manappuram under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.