
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv Uikey
Respondant Advocate Adv Johrapurkar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/597/07( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2007 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bhaskar Sadhuji Ramteke Deori Dist Gondia...........Appellant(s)Versus...
Case Number: 597
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2018
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate TOM JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/15/636( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2015 )1. N.R. BABUS/O RAJAPPAN,NEDUMCHERIL HOUSE,VADACODE P.O.,VAZHAKULAM,MUVATTUPUZHA - 686670...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER, MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVI...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2018
Court Name: Ahmednagar
Appelant Advocate Mundada
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Ahmednagar.judgementOffice Phone No.(0241)2347917Complaint Case No. CC/17/109( Date of Filing : 05 Apr 2017 )1. Vitthal Bhau Kadam Sai, Vidhya Nagar, Pimplas, Tal- RahataAhmadnagerMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Branch Manag...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RASHMI SINGH & MS. SANIA SHEIKH
Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH JOSHI & KUMAR KISLAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1938 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/10/2010 in Appeal No. 1041/2007 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. RAJENDRA CHIMANLAL MODY5, DHARMENDRA ROAD, RAJKOTGUJARAT...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MAHIN...
Case Number: 1938
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2018
Court Name: Kamrup
Appelant Advocate Mr Rupjit De
Respondant Advocate Mr Sujoy Goswami
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/64/2012( Date of Filing : 30 Oct 2012 )1. Ajmera Industrial Services ,Represented by its proprietor Shri Sushil Kumar Ajmera S/O- Mahabir Prasad Ajmera,Asha Tower,5th floor, Panbazar,Guwahati-1,P.S- Pa...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV S B Kasturiwala
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/15/432( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/06/2015 in Case No. cc/2007/417 of District Yavatmal)1. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services LtdNagar Parisha...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/15/442( Date of Filing : 17 Aug 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/06/2015 in Case No. cc/07/417 of District Yavatmal)1. Sateesh janrao MhatreLohara Tal & Dist.YavatmalYavatmalMa...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2022
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/14/232( Date of Filing : 21 Apr 2014 )1. Viresh MohanDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.DELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:H...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2018
Court Name: Kendrapara
Appelant Advocate Sri N.K.Malik & Sri B. Mishra
Respondant Advocate Sri R.K.Sahoo
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KENDRAPARA, ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/40/2017( Date of Filing : 24 Apr 2017 )1. Prassana SatapathyS/o- Late Fakir Satapathy At- Arokharda Po- Olakana Ps- DerabishKendraparaOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mahindra...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2018
Court Name: Dibrugarh
Appelant Advocate SRI SANJAY CHETRY
Respondant Advocate
The case of the complainant in brief is that the complainant is a businessman by profession having a Polyclinic & Diagnostic Centre at Dibrugarh. The complainant for the convenience of running his business purchased one LMV Mahindra XUV 500 on 25-12-12 from OP No.1 through it...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mahindra & Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mahindra & Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mahindra & Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.