
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAVINDER ARORA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 276 of 2015Date of Institution: 24.03.2015Date of Decision : 26.05.2016Vinod Sharma s/o Sh. Ram Nath, Resident of Village and Post Office Shahzadpur, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. Appellant/Co...
Case Number: 276
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2016
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate Anoop
Respondant Advocate TS Jangra
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 36/111. Bhim RajAnaj mandi EllenabadSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Magma leasing LtdDabwali road SirsaSirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh S.B Lohia PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajiv Mehta MEMBER For the Complainant...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2016
Court Name: Bhadrak
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALAComplaint Case No. CC/410/20101. Vinod Sharma aged 39 years son of Sh. Ram Nath, resident of village and Post office Shahzadpur, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Magma Leasing Company...
Case Number: 410
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE & MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY
Respondant Advocate M/S. SANJEEV SINGH & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2777 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 01/07/2013 in Appeal No. 30/2013 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4759/2013,IA/5505/20131. ABHEY SINGHS/O.PRABHU DAYAL. R/O H.NO-333 STREET NO-14, VIJAY NA...
Case Number: 2777
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKTI K. PATTANAIK
Respondant Advocate M/S. SANJEEV SINGH & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3581 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 04/06/2012 in Appeal No. 820/2006 of the State Commission Orissa)1. SURYA NARAYAN DASS/o Late Bholenath Das At/Po Bhasilpur P.O RaghunathpurJaghatsinghpurOrissa.......
Case Number: 3581
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 327 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 30/01/2009 in Complaint No. 78/2007 of the State Commission Orissa)1. HRUDANANDA SAHOOS/O.BANCHHANIDHI SAHOO, RAMPAI, P.O. KHUNTUNIDIST. CUTTACKORISSA...........Appellant...
Case Number: 327
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MONORANJAN PADHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3299 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/05/2011 in Appeal No. 298/2010 of the State Commission Orissa) WITH IA/2688/20131. BALLAVANANDA BARIKR/o Village Lunukua P.O JhimaniJagatsinghpurOrissa............
Case Number: 3299
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SANJEEV SINGH & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3755 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/08/2012 in Appeal No. 364/2012 of the State Commission Orissa)1. M/S. MAGMA FINCORP LTD. (FORMERLY MAGMA LEASING LTD.)Having its Zonal Indistrial Area,Phase-I Op...
Case Number: 3755
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKTI K. PATTANAIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 687 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/04/2012 in Complaint No. 85/2008 of the State Commission Orissa)1. IFTEKAR AHMEDSON OF LATE SHARFUDDIN AHMED, AT SARFUDDIN AHMED ROAD, PS: RAJGANGPUR, SUDERGARHODISHA....
Case Number: 687
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Magma Leasing in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Magma Leasing ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Magma Leasing under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.