
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate Sh. Bal Raj Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. P.K. Gupta
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JIND. Complaint Case No : 275of 2011 Date of Institution : 22.06.2011 Date of Decision : 23.12.2016 ⦁ Dhoop Singh son of Fateh Singh 2. Kamla wife o...
Case Number: 275
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2016
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate AK
Respondant Advocate MSS
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/779/20151. Shivakumar Goud AShivakumar Goud A, No.13, Metagalli Extension, ...
Case Number: 779
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.Mahajan
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.79 of 2013 Date of Institution: 23.01.2013 Date of Decision: 14.12.20161. Life Insurance Corporation of India throug...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV KANT
Respondant Advocate ADV BORKAR
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/08/794(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/09/2008 in Case No. CC/08/57 of District State Commission)1. ZONAL MANAGER LIC OF INDIA YOGKSHEM BUILDING JEEVAN -BIMA MARG MUMBAI -212. SENIOR...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Sandip Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 419 Instituted on: 13.06.2016 Decided on: 08.12.2016Smt. Parwinder Kaur W/o Late Harpal Singh son of Gulzar Singh, resident of Ward No.4, Victoria Enclave, Patran Road, Dirba, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Compl...
Case Number: 419
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Sandip Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 420 Instituted on: 13.06.2016 Decided on: 08.12.2016Smt. Parwinder Kaur W/o Late Harpal Singh son of Gulzar Singh, resident of Ward No.4, Victoria Enclave, Patran Road, Dirba, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Compl...
Case Number: 420
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Sandip Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 429 Instituted on: 13.06.2016 Decided on: 08.12.2016Smt. Parvinder Kaur W/o Late Harpal Singh son of Gulzar Singh, resident of Ward No.4, Victoria Enclave, Patran Road, Dirba, Tehsil Sunam, Distt. Sangrur. ..Compl...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate R.M Dutta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Piyush Sharma,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:161 of 2016Date of Institution:04.03.2016Date of Decision:01.12.2016V.P.Singh son of late Maj.G.B.Singh, r/o House No.3174, Sector 41-D, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1] LIC of Ind...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: Debagarh
Appelant Advocate Abhijit Mishra, S. Soren, S.Dash, K.K. Rout.
Respondant Advocate Sachi Kant Dash
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DEOGARH.Shri P.Ch. Mahapatra, Member & Smt. Jayanti Pradhan, MemberManoja Manjari Padhi,aged about 50 Years,W/O - Late Prafulla Kumar Padhi,At – Matha Sahi, Ward No.3,P.O/P.S/ Dist - Deogarh. .... Complainant. VersusSr...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LAWYER'S KNIT & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR.NEERAJ GUPTA,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4770 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/09/2012 in Appeal No. 7/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. SMT. T. PUSHPAMMAKuchampalle Village Via Iruvaram Madhavaram, P.O Yadamari Mandal, CHITTOR...
Case Number: 4770
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lic Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lic Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Lic Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.