
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SWETANK SHANTANU & MR. PRATAP SHANKER
Respondant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 600 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Complaint No. 80/2011 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) WITH IA/1215/2014,IA/5275/20131. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIV...
Case Number: 603
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1355 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1386/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.36-38A, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI - 400021MAHARASTRA.....
Case Number: 1355
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate MR. AAROHI BHALLA & MR. SUBODH PATIL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1356 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1387/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.36-38A, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINTMUMBAI - 400021MAHARASTRA......
Case Number: 1356
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Satpal Singh
Respondant Advocate Vineet Rathor
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 431 of 2011 Date of instt.19.07.2011 Date of decision: 11.3.2015Jagdish Chand son of Shri Sunder resident of House No.20, village Samana Bahu tehsil Nilokheri district Karnal.. ……….....
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-04-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 745 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/11/2013 in Appeal No. 490/2012 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.15 PARK STREET, KOLKATA - 700 016W.B...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 745
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate L M PATEL
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2015
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Pankaj Gupta.
Respondant Advocate Mr.Shekh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/09/366(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/03/2009 in Case No. CC/07/167 of District Chandrapur)1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.Registered office at Mumbai. Its Regional Office at 5th Flo...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHANKAR KUMAR JHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3102-3103 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 29/05/2014 in Appeal No. 109/2014 & 122/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.HAVING ITS NEW REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 27 BKC, C27, G ...
Case Number: 3102
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.K. JHA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1901 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/04/2014 in Appeal No. 23/2014 & 109/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 27 BKC, C27, G BLOCK, BAN...
Case Number: 1901
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2014
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate M. KISHORE KUMAR
Respondant Advocate NHRK. GUPTA
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/38/20141. M. SATHISH KUMARS/O. SAMBASIVA RAO, R/O. D.NO.16-5-314, 1ST LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR.GUNTUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.,D.NO. 40-1-48/1, M.G. RD, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA.KRISH...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.