company-name-logo

Kotak Mahindra Bank

Latest Judgments

Total 1302 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra Bank.

NCDRC

PUJA KISHOREJI LATURIA V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Appeal No. 235/2010 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.Through its authori...

Case Number: 3045

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2019

NCDRC

SARVESH KISHOREJI LATURIA V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.)

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Appeal No. 235/2010 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.Through its authori...

Case Number: 3046

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2019

NCDRC

KAUSHALAYABAI BALARAMJI SONI V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Appeal No. 235/2010 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.Through its authori...

Case Number: 3047

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2019

NCDRC

KAMALABAI NANDLALJI HEDHA THROUGH LR SH. GANESHLAL NANDALALJI HEDA V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Appeal No. 235/2010 of the State Commission Maharashtra) 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.) & ANR.Through its authori...

Case Number: 3048

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2019

Maharashtra

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. THROUGH, MANAGER V/S SHRI. HARISH DEVICHARAN TIWARI

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. S.S. SHINDE

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/96/2018( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/637/20161. SHRI. HARISH DEVICHARAN TIWARI R/O. 12, PRAGATISHEE...

Case Number: 96

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 31-07-2019

Haryana

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited V/S Angrej Singh

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Apar Singh Bedi

Respondant Advocate G.S Khillan

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no. 14 of 2017 Date of instt.: 17.04.2017 Date of Decision 19.07.2019Angrej Singh son of Shri Jarnail Singh resident of House no.503/485, Kalandri Gate, Sushad Manjil, Karnal. …..DH/Complainant...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2019

Haryana

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. V/S Surender Kumar S/o Ghanshyam Dass

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Sushil Garg

Respondant Advocate

CC No. 179 of 2019Surender Kumar Vs. M/s Kotak MahindraPresent: Complainant with Sh. Sushil Garg, Adv. for complainant. Sh. KK Gupta, Adv. for respondent. Written statement not filed by the respondent. Respondent handed over no objection certificate to the complainant. Ke...

Case Number: 179

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 16-07-2019

West Bengal

The Manager, Credit Card Division, Kotak Mahindra Bank and another V/S Sudipto Bhaumik

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Credit Card   Kotak  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate Pritam Bhattacharya and another

Respondant Advocate Sabyasachi Bhattacharjee

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/283/2018( Date of Filing : 04 Oct 2018 )1. Sudipto BhaumikS/o Lt. Subhas Chandra Bhaumik, 1A, Ramkrishna Das Lane, P.S. - Amh...

Case Number: 283

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2019

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd V/S Kamlesh

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Deepak Gupta

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/501/2017Date of Institution:06/07/20170Date of Decision:04/07/20191. Kamlesh aged 42 years widow of Dharam Pal son of Ram Kishan resident of Village Kheri Gujjran, Tehsil Dera Bassi District SA...

Case Number: 501

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2019

West Bengal

Kotak Mahindra Bank V/S Smt. Chitra Rani Banerjee

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Prasanta Banerjee

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/733/2018( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/08/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/353/2018 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Smt. Chi...

Case Number: 733

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Bank in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Bank ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.