company-name-logo

Kotak Mahindra Bank

Latest Judgments

Total 1302 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra Bank.

Haryana

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. V/S Sumit Madaan S/o Om Parkash

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Harvinder Aneja

Respondant Advocate

CC No.310 of 2021.Sumit Madaan Vs. Kotak Mahindra.Present:Ms. Sidhi Rani,Advocate for complainant.Keeping in view the separate statement suffered by counsel for complainant, present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. File be consigned to records...

Case Number: 310

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2021

Karnataka

Kotak Mahindra Bank Credit V/S Sri. G. Balaji Balaji Naidu

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/255/2020( Date of Filing : 05 Mar 2020 )1. Sri. G. Balaji Balaji NaiduS/o. Late Govindar...

Case Number: 255

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2020

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2021

Circuit Bench Nagpur

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. V/S SAU. JYOTI W/O DILIP TEMBHEKAR

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ADV.M.R.JOHARAPURKAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/17/300( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/04/2017 in Case No. RBT/CC/13/643 of District Additional DCF, Nagpur)1. SAU. JYOTI W/O DILIP TEMBHEKARTHROUGH P...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-09-2021

Punjab

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited V/S Jatinder Kumar

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh. R.K. Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/289/2018( Date of Filing : 09 Jul 2018 )1. Jatinder KumarR/o House No. 21 New Ganesh Nagar, Rama Mandi, Near Dhillon Resort...

Case Number: 289

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2021

Kerala

Kotak Mahindra Bank V/S P K Jose

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Kottayam

Appelant Advocate Thomas Mathew

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/90/2021( Date of Filing : 04 May 2021 )1. P K JosePuthusseril House, Kudamaloor P O Kottaym. Pin. 686017KottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra BankTheressa Plaza Railway Station road ...

Case Number: 90

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2021

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2021

Haryana

Kotak Mahindra Bank V/S Suraj Parkash

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Ambala

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA. Complaint Case No.: 250 of 2018. Date of Institution : 07.08.2018. Date of decision : 06.09.2021.Suraj Parkash s/o Sh. Lakhi Singh, H.No. 10, Shiv Pratap Nagar, Ambala Cantt. ……. Complainant. Ver...

Case Number: 250

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 10-09-2021

Haryana

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. V/S Manav Bhatia S/o Ashok Bhatia

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Bhupinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

CC No.97 of 2021.Manav Bhatia Versus Kotak Mahindra.Present:None for the complainant. None for the respondent.Complainant has not appeared for the last three dates of hearing and similar is the position of respondent. Case has been called several times since morning. Respondent h...

Case Number: 97

|

Date of Filing: 23-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2021

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited V/S Smt. Nidhi Gupta

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mohit Sarin, Adv.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:634 of 2018Date of Institution:13.11.2018Date of Decision:07.07.2021Smt.Nidhi Gupta, R/o House No.3373, Vidhan Sabhan Society, Sector 49/D, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1] Kotak Mah...

Case Number: 634

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2021

NCDRC

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.)

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   New India Assurance   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate MR. S.M. TRIPATHI, MR. L. GOYAL, MS. LATA LOCHAN & MS. KARUNASREE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4626 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/08/2013 in Appeal No. 2144/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.)CORPORATE & REGISTERED OFFIC...

Case Number: 4626

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2021

NCDRC

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.)

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   New India Assurance   Kotak  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR & MR. SAYOOJ MOHANDAS M.

Respondant Advocate MR. S.M. TRIPATHI, MR. L. GOYAL, MS. LATA LOCHAN & MS. KARUNASREE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4627 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/08/2013 in Appeal No. 2145/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ING VYSYA BANK LTD.)A BANKING COMPANY HAVING ITS...

Case Number: 4627

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Bank in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Bank ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.