company-name-logo

Kanpur Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 133 Consumer Court Cases Against Kanpur Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 153 OF 2012 IN RP/4135/20111. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMB...

Case Number: 153

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2012

NCDRC

RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4135 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2039/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Kanpur Development Authority, MothijheelKanpur NagarU...

Case Number: 4135

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2012

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KANPUR V/S SATI PRASAD

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BAJPAI AND CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/03/2007 in Complaint No. 35/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SATI PRASADS/O GOPI NATH R/O 616, BLOCK-D, SECTOR - 17, KONARK ENCLAVE VASUNDRA, GHAZIABAD............

Case Number: 215

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

NCDRC

KARUNA SHANKAR SHUKLA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1292/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice -Chairman, MotijheelKanpurU.P...........Pet...

Case Number: 2124

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-07-2012

NCDRC

MUNNEY KHAN V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. A. HASSAN & MR. ABRAR AHMAD

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/07/2011 in Appeal No. 687/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE- CHAIRMEN,MOTIJHEEL, KANPUR-UTTAR PRADESH......

Case Number: 2123

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2012

NCDRC

AJAI VERMA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVI BHUSHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3937 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 09/02/2010 in Appeal No. 2092/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice- Chairman, MotijheelKanpurU.P...........Pet...

Case Number: 3937

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2012

NCDRC

GAYATRI TRIPATHI V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADEEP MISRA

Respondant Advocate DR. SANDEEP SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/02/2010 in Appeal No. 3170/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice Chairman, Moti JheelKanpur NagarUttar Prade...

Case Number: 2655

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-12-2011

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S UNIVERSAL MOTORS (P) LTD.

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. V.P. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2004(Against the Order dated 01/06/2004 in Complaint No. 3/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UNIVERSAL MOTORS (P) LTD.16/64, CIVIL LINES KANPUR UP...........Appellant(s)Versus1. KANPUR DEVELOPM...

Case Number: 211

|

Date of Filing: 29-06-2004

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2011

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN, KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MANGAL PRASAD GUPTA

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LAV KUMAR AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 02/04/2009 in Appeal No. 469/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MANGAL PRASAD GUPTAS/o Late Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, R/o House No. 69/08, Danakhori Kanpur...

Case Number: 2150

|

Date of Filing: 19-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2010

NCDRC

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S AJIT KUMAR

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 08 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/338/2010(Against the Order dated 09/11/2009 in Appeal No. 3168/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. AJIT KUMARR/o House No. 147/459, U-Block, Nirala NagarKan...

Case Number: 338

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kanpur Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kanpur Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kanpur Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.