company-name-logo

Jaipur Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 64 Consumer Court Cases Against Jaipur Development Authority.

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S TRILOK CHAND JAIN

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3044 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/07/2016 in Appeal No. 78/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. TRILOK CHAND JAIN35/124 RAJAT PATH, MANSAROVARJAIPURRAJASTHAN...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 3044

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2017

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJAY PANDEY

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3043 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/07/2016 in Appeal No. 77/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SANJAY PANDEYA-36, LAXMI NARAYANPURI, SURAJPOLE GATE,JAIPURRAJASHTAN...........Petitioner(s)Ve...

Case Number: 3043

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2017

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RENU VERMA

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3042 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/07/2016 in Appeal No. 76/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RENU VERMA21/192, KAVERI PATH OPPOSITE STADIUM, MANSAROVAR JAIPURRAJASHTAN...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3042

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 08-06-2017

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DILEEP KUMAR

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3040 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/07/2016 in Appeal No. 73/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. DILEEP KUMARA-138, JDA COLONY, MALVIYA NAGAR,JAIPURRAJASHTAN...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. J...

Case Number: 3040

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2017

Rajasthan

Selendra Sharma S/O Shri Shedu Ram Sharma V/S Jaipur Development Authority

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mukesh Meena

Respondant Advocate

State Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission RajasthanJaipurFirst Appeal No. A/1269/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/06/2016 in Case No. 1070/2013 of District Jaipur-IV)1. Jaipur Development AuthorityJawahar lal Nehru Marg, JaipurJaipurRajasthan...........Appellant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 1269

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 12-04-2017

Rajasthan

Harish Chand Gupta S/o Shiv Chand Gupta V/S Jaipur Development Authority , Jaipur

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Preetik Sharma

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 1264/2015Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur & ors.Vs.Harish Gupta r/o 98, Ganga Vihar Colony, Near Arjun Nagar Phatak, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur.Date of Order 16.01.2017Before:Hon'b...

Case Number: 1264

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2017

Rajasthan

Mahesh Chadn Gupta s/o Madan Mohan Gupta V/S Jaipur Development Authority Through Commissioner

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mukesh Meena

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO:676 /2016Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Zone 12, JDA Circle, JLN Marg, Jaipur through Dy.Commissioner & ors. Vs.Mahesh Chand Gupta r/o New Colony, Mandavar Tehsil Mahua, Distt. ...

Case Number: 676

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2016

Rajasthan

Pawan Arora Seceratry Jaipur Development Authority V/S Shaid Ahamad s/o Gulam Ali

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Jabbar Khan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 178 /2016Sayad Ahmed r/o S.A. Electric Works Akdo ka Rasta, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur.Vs.Shri Pawar Arora, Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority ,Ramkishore Vyas Bhawan, JLN Marg, Jaipu...

Case Number: 178

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2016

NCDRC

SHAIL BALA GUPTA V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2650 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/05/2014 in Appeal No. 133/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.JLN MARG, THROUGH COMMISSIONERJAIPURRAJASTHAN2. JAIPUR DEV...

Case Number: 2650

|

Date of Filing: 30-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2014

NCDRC

UMAKANT AGGARWAL V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4263 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/08/2012 in Appeal No. 964/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough the Commissioner, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Indira Nagar Ci...

Case Number: 4263

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jaipur Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jaipur Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Jaipur Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.