company-name-logo

Iffco Tokio General Insurance

Latest Judgments

Total 2439 Consumer Court Cases Against Iffco Tokio General Insurance.

Haryana

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Amit Kumar son of Sh. Suresh Kumar

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance   Suresh  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.K. Behal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 545/2018( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2018 )1. Amit Kumar son of Sh. Suresh Kumar R/o Village Nigana, Tehsil Kalanaur, District Rohtak...........Complainant(s)Versus1. IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co....

Case Number: 545

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2021

Punjab

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited V/S Naresh Kumar

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Sh.Udit Goyal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/204/2018( Date of Filing : 25 Apr 2018 )1. Naresh KumarNaresh Kumar Bansal S/o Sh.Mohan Lal Bansal, R/o B-11/725, Bharat Nagar,Street No.6-A, Near Het...

Case Number: 204

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2021

Chandigarh

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company V/S Mahavir Singh

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Wazir Singh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/309/2018Date of Institution:26/06/2018Date of Decision:03/02/2021Mahavir Singh son of Shri Fateh Singh, resident of House No.151-152, Green Park, Tehsil Camp, Panipat… ComplainantV E...

Case Number: 309

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 03-02-2021

Haryana

Iffco Tokio General Insurance V/S Naresh

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Raj Karan

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.K. Behal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 443/2018( Date of Filing : 17 Sep 2018 )1. Naresh S/o Lakhi Ram, R/o Village Humayunpur, District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Iffco Tokio General InsuranceOffice Iffco Sadan, C1 Distri...

Case Number: 443

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2021

Haryana

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited V/S Jai Bhagwan

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Jagmal Singh Mandhan

Respondant Advocate Ashok Vohra

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 105 of 2020 Date of instt.17.02.2020 Date of Decision 15.01.2021Jai Bhagwan aged about 50 years son of Shri Dayanand, resident of H.No.10, Gali No.1, R.K.Puram, Karnal. …….Complai...

Case Number: 105

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2021

NCDRC

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. V/S ANITA SHARMA

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.K. BHAWNANI

Respondant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1222 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 16/09/2014 in Complaint No. 6/2014 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. ANITA SHARMAW/O. LATE SHRI YOGENDRA SHARMA, R/O. PLOT NO.14, AVANI PRIDE, DALDAL SEONI ROAD, M...

Case Number: 1222

|

Date of Filing: 18-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-01-2021

Assam

IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co Ltd. V/S Manju Barthakur

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Kamrup

Appelant Advocate Shri M.J.Quadir

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/35/2020( Date of Filing : 05 Jun 2020 )1. Manju BarthakurW/O- Mr Pankaj Kr Barthakur, Namghor Path, Panjabari, P.O- Panjabari, P.S- Satgaon,Dist-Kamrup(M)...........Complainant(s)Versus1. IFFCO TOKIO G...

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 24-12-2020

Haryana

Iffco Tokio General Insurance V/S Raj Kumar

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.K. Behal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/3( Date of Filing : 02 Jan 2019 )1. Raj KumarS/o Sh. Jagdish, R/o H.No. 293/20, Saini Pura, Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Iffco Tokio General InsuranceRajendra Kinha Tower, IInd F...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-01-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Shashi Kant Dwivedi V/S Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/164/2020( Date of Filing : 10 Dec 2020 )InFirst Appeal No. A/2011/18761. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. LtdCorporate Office 4rth ...

Case Number: 164

|

Date of Filing: 10-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2020

Haryana

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. V/S KULDEEP SINGH

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate HIMANSHU SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.92 of 2020 Date of Institution:23.01.2020 Date of Decision:29.10.2020Kuldeep Singh son of Shri Madan Mohan, R/o Village Berpura, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala, Haryana (India) through his GPA-...

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 19-11-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Iffco Tokio General Insurance in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Iffco Tokio General Insurance ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Iffco Tokio General Insurance under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.