
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/293/2016( Date of Filing : 08 Jun 2016 )1. Vipul GuptaB-27,Sec-3,Noida.Gautam Buddh NagarUttar Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Idea Cellular Ltd. A-68,Sec-64,...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 25.05.2018First Appeal No.863/2013(Arising out of the order dated 13.06.2013 passed in Complainant Case No. 197/2010 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum...
Case Number: 863
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-06-2018
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Arnab Kumar Khatua
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/159/2018( Date of Filing : 09 Apr 2018 )1. Kingshuk Karmakar109B, Akhil Mistry lane, P.S. Muchipara, P.O.AmherStreet, Kolkata-700009......
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rameet Bakshi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Respondent in person
At the time of arguments, Sh.Vaibhav Jain, respondent No.1 showing grace has agreed to withdraw his original complaint (in District Forum), filed against the appellant and another Company. He stated that his concern was only to show mistake committed by the Opposite Parties and h...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2018
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
VIVEK SACHDEVA VSIDEA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. Date: 21.05.2018Present : Counsel for Complainant. Counsel for Complainant has appeared and stated that he wants to withdraw the complaint, his request for withdrawing the complaint is accepted and the same is dismissed as withdrawn with...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2018
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/2016( Date of Filing : 10 May 2016 )InComplaint Case No. CC/146/20161. Rajesh Kapil S/o sh Subash ChanderR/o H...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2018
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh K.C. Malhotra
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/146/2016( Date of Filing : 29 Mar 2016 )1. Rajesh Kapil S/o sh Subash ChanderR/o House No.606,St No.12-B,Avtar NagarJalandha...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Atul Kaushik Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rameet,Adv
The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant is not interested for restoration of the connection though the same has been sought in the main prayer of the complaint. The parties have amicably settled the matter. The counsel for OP No.2 states that the Op No.2 ...
Case Number: 691
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kumar Sambhaw
Respondant Advocate Rohit Kumar Verma
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1151/2016( Date of Filing : 08 Jun 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/05/2016 in Case No. C/83/2015 of District Jyotiba Phule Nagar)1. RashidAmro...
Case Number: 1151
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Singh & Shuchita Singh
Respondant Advocate Ravi Kumar Rawat
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/916( Date of Filing : 05 May 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Idea cellular-...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Idea in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Idea ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Idea under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.