
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J.P.Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 120/2017Kamlesh Sharma s/o Ramavatar Sharma r/o B 315 Murlipura, Jaipur.Vs.Rajasthan Housing Board through Commissioner, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur & ors. FIRST APPEAL NO: 195/2017Rajasthan...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Court Name: Gadag
Appelant Advocate M.B.Sajjanar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Behind Tahsildar Office, Basaveshwar Nagar, GADAGExecution Application No. EA/8/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/1/20171. Mahantesh.B.AngadiR/o Vivekanand 2nd adda road, Gadag...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Commissioner, Karnatak Housing ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S BSK LEGAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4070 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/08/2014 in Appeal No. 591/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NEAR VIDHAN SABHA ,JANPATHJAIPURRAJASTH...
Case Number: 4070
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S SHANAVAS
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESAL COMMISSION SISUVIHARLANE VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.569/15JUDGMENT DATED : 28.02.2018(Appeal filed against the order in CC.No.324/14 on the file of CDRF, Idukki order dated : 30.03.2015)PRESENTSRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH : JUDICIAL MEMB...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. N.K. CHAUHAN & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 25/05/2017 in Appeal No. 1533/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 3 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN, JYOTI NAGARJAIPURRAJASTHAN2. RAJASTHAN HO...
Case Number: 2573
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. N.K. CHAUHAN & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 25/05/2017 in Appeal No. 1533/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 3 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN, JYOTI NAGARJAIPURRAJASTHAN2. RAJASTHAN HO...
Case Number: 2574
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. N.K. CHAUHAN & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 25/05/2017 in Appeal No. 1533/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 3 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN, JYOTI NAGARJAIPURRAJASTHAN2. RAJASTHAN HO...
Case Number: 2575
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. DISHA JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. N.K. CAHUHAN & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2364 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 27/05/2015 in Appeal No. 280/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RATAN DEVIW/O SHRI NAVAL KOISHORE GOYAL, R/O SHEETALPADA VILLAGE ,BOWLI,DISTRICT : SAWAI MADH...
Case Number: 2364
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Satinder Kumar Rana
Respondant Advocate
In the instant case the claim of the complainant more than 20 lacs as such this Forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain and decide this case in view of the judgment passed in Ambrish Kumar Shukla & 21 Ors Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. passed by the Hon’b...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Adv. Satinder Kumar Rana
Respondant Advocate
In the instant case the claim of the complainant more than 20 lacs as such this Forum has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain and decide this case in view of the judgment passed in Ambrish Kumar Shukla & 21 Ors Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. passed by the Hon’b...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Housing Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Housing Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Housing Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.