Haryana Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 323 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Urban Development Authority.
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SURENDER KUMAR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV BHATNAGAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2027 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/01/2010 in Appeal No. 3493/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SURENDER KUMARR/o. House No. 88, Des Raj ColonyPanipatHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 2027
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPINING
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN K. MALHOTRA & RAJAN KHANNA
Respondant Advocate MS. SHWATA MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 78 OF 1999 1. M/S. G.M. WORSTED SPININGMILLS P. LTD. OFFICE AT B - 86 GREATER KAILASH PART - I NEW DELHI - 110048 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAUTHORITY HUDA THROUGH ...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-1999
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2010
INDU SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 23 Mar 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1182/2010(Against the Order dated 18/12/2009 in Appeal No. 2365/2006 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANRThrough its Chief Adm...
Case Number: 1182
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2010
SMT. SHARMILA DEVI V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRASHANT KR. SHARMA & J.N. MAHATO
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 16 Nov 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3486/2006(Against the Order dated 05/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1759/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYESRATE PFFOCE . SORSA HA...
Case Number: 3486
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2010
KIRPAL SINGH AND ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ARUNABH CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 30 Jan 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/258/2006(Against the Order dated 09/02/2005 in Appeal No. 92/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSECTOR -6 PANCHKULA HARYANA ....
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2006
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHANTI DEVI & ORS
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN SHARMA & U.M. TRIPATHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/02/2008 in Appeal No. 1512/2002 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SHANTI DEVI & ORSResident Bhattu Kalan, HissarHaryana2. RAM KISHANResident of Bhattu Kalan, Hi...
Case Number: 2224
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2010
Smt. Suman Lata V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 1415 of 2008 1. Haryana Urban Development Authoritythrough its Sub divisional Engineer, , Hisar. , . ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Smt. ...
Case Number: 1415
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MRS. RAJ PATHAK V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate JURIS CONSULTUS
Respondant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1053 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 04/11/2005 in Appeal No. 8/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYRESIDENT OF 382-383 HOUSING BOARD COLONY SIRSA ROAD HISAR .......
Case Number: 1053
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S MANJULA KRISHNAN & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 20 Apr 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1392/2009(Against the Order dated 22/01/2009 in Appeal No. 934/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. MANJULA KRISHNAN & ANR.W/o. Sh. Krishanan Veerappan R/o.H.No.48...
Case Number: 1392
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2009
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MAJOR SATJIT SINGH GANDHI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HEMEN AGGARWAL & SAVI AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 01 Jul 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2312/2009(Against the Order dated 10/02/2009 in Appeal No. 456/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. MAJOR SATJIT SINGH GANDHIResident of H. No.1531, Sector - 36, C...
Case Number: 2312
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.