company-name-logo

Government

Latest Judgments

Total 995 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.

NCDRC

GOVERNMENT MULTI-SPECIALITY HOSPITAL & 3 ORS. V/S SUMAN & 4 ORS.

Hospital   Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANPREET SINGH DOABIA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Complaint No. 6/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. SUMAN & 4 ORS.W/o Desraj, R/o 176, Block J, Colony No. 4, Industrial Area, Chandigarh Punjab2. DE...

Case Number: 174

|

Date of Filing: 29-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2018

Uttar Pradesh

UP GOVERNMENT DM AND OTHERS V/S RAMBABU

Government  

Court Name: Hamirpur

Appelant Advocate GYAN PRAKASH GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HAMIRPURUPCOURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/44/2017( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 2017 )1. RAMBABUBIHUNI KHURD, MUSKARAHAMIRPURU P...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UP GOVERNMENT DM AND OTHERSHAMIRPURHAMIRPURU P............Opp.Party(s) B...

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2018

NCDRC

SUPERTECH LIMITED V/S GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS' WELFARE ORGANISATION (GOWO) & 11 ORS.

Supertech   Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANISH DAYAL, MR. SIDDHARTH VAID & MR. ISHWAR MOHANTY

Respondant Advocate M/S. LOTUS LAW PARTNERS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 955 OF 20151. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS' WELFARE ORGANISATION (GOWO) & 11 ORS.UG-47, UPPER GROUND FLOOR, ANSAL CHAMBER-II, BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE,NEW DELHI-1100662. SAVITA K. VERMA.3. KARTIKEY VERMA............Comp...

Case Number: 955

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2018

NCDRC

RAJESH GUPTA V/S GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY DELHI

Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MAHA BIR SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. H.L. DIHANA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2929 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 28/07/2017 in Appeal No. 41/2017 of the State Commission Delhi)1. GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY DELHITHROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER OF ...

Case Number: 2929

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2018

Karnataka

HDFC Bnak Ltd. And Syndicate Bank A Government of India V/S Sri. R. Ravindra PGOBA, DMM,DPM

Hdfc   Hdfc   Syndicate Bank   Government  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. Lokesh K

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/14/13301. Sri. R. Ravindra PGOBA, DMM,DPMR/at. No. 5, Vinayaka Layout, Teachers Layout Road, Vidyaranyapura Bangalore-560097............Complainant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2018

Telangana

1.G. Nirmala Kumari V/S The Principal S.R. and B.G.N.R. Government College,

Government  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. N.V. Anantha Krishna

Respondant Advocate Mr V. Gourisankar Rao R1

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. FA/1229/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/05/2013 in Case No. CC/114/2011 of District Khammam)1. The Principal S.R. and B.G.N.R. Government College, Khammam District............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.G. Nirmala Kum...

Case Number: 1229

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2018

Maharashtra

M/S. Nitin Motors Through Shri. Mahohar Khushalchand Kachela V/S Government Of Maharashtra, Assistant Conservator of Forest, Gadchiroli Throudh Ashok Ram Parhad

Government  

Court Name: Gadchiroli

Appelant Advocate Adv. P.J. Ghongade

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Gadchiroli.M.I.D.C. Road, T - Point, Navegaon, Tah. Dist. Gadchiroli. Pin No. 442605.MaharashtraExecution Application No. EA/6/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/32/20161. Government Of Maharashtra, Assistant Conservator of Forest, Gadchiroli T...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 28-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2018

Karnataka

Karnataka State Government D Group Employees Central Association , V/S Sri.V.N. Chinnaiah Raj Urs,

Government  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint filed on: 31.08.2015 Disposed on: 06.01.2018BEFORE THE IV ADDL DISTRICTCONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BENGALURU1ST FLOOR, BMTC, B-BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 027 CC.No.1568/2015DATED THIS THE 6TH JANUARY OF 2018PRESENTSRI.S.L....

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2018

Uttar Pradesh

DR. NAVNEET AGGARWAL V/S GOVERNMENT

Government  

Court Name: Shamli

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes and Redressel ForumShamli, Uttar PradeshMiscellaneous Application No. MA/5/2017( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2017 )InComplaint Case No. CC/11/20141. GOVERNMENTSHAMLI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DR. NAVNEET AGGARWALMEERUT...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HO...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 25-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2019

Chandigarh

Government of India through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner V/S Nirmal Jit Singh Walia

Provident Fund   Provident Fund   Regional Provident Fund Commissioner   Government  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate Manish Kumar,Adv

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:220 of 2017Date of Institution:07.03.2017Date of Decision:07.12.2017Nirmal Jit Singh Walia s/o Sh.Swaran Singh Walia, R/o Amar Swaran Niwas, #511, Phase-1, SAS Nagar (Mohali) 160055 &hellip...

Case Number: 220

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-01-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.