
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Zile Singh
Respondant Advocate K.K.gupta
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 736 of 2011. Date of institution: 13.07.2011 Date of decision: 17.03.2016Som Nath son of Shri Ram lal resident of village Baindi, Sub Tehsil Radaur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. &h...
Case Number: 736
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2016
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAComplaint Case No. CC236/2013-I1. DEVENDRA SINGH BAGHELON KA MOHALLA RAJA SU VILL BASAI DOG THANA BASAI DHOLPUR RAJ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LTD THROUGH ITS MANOJ SHAR...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2016
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ashu Mittal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 131Date of Institution : 8.09.2015Date of Decision : 8.12.2015Harpinder Singh aged 27 years s/o Angrej Singh r/o Near Unique Public School, Kotkapura, Tehsil Kotkapura, District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusFul...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate JATINDER KUMAR
Respondant Advocate ANIL SIDHAR
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Complaint No.197 of 2014 Instituted on:07.08.2014 Date of order:12.10.2015Parveen Kumar son of Raj Singh, r/o H.No.314/24, Arya Nagar, Sonepat. ..Complainant. Versus1.The Manager, Fullerton India Credit Co. Ltd....
Case Number: 197
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashok Jindal & Sandeep Singh
Respondant Advocate
2nd Additional BenchSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.940 of 2013 Date of institution : 30.08.2013 Date of decision : 09.07.2015 Aas...
Case Number: 940
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate J.K. Babbar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/738/2014Date of Institution:10/11/2014Date of Decision:07/07/2015Satish Kumar (Sr. Citizen) son of Shri G.R. Arora, resident of House No.32, Ward No.1, Dashmesh Nagar, Sector 15, Kha...
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2015
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. Shaikh Shafi
Respondant Advocate
District consumer Disputes Redressal Forum NandedVisava Nagar, V.I.P. Road, NandedComplaint Case No. CC/15/171. Balaji Govindrao TidakeMalkoli, Tq. LohaNandedMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Fullerton India Credit Company Ltd.Ali Bhai Tower Bulding, Shivaji Nagar, Nan...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2015
Court Name: Rupnagar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sohan Singh Sohal, Adv
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTT. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ROPAR Consumer Complaint No. : 2 of 01.01.2015 Date of decision : 18.06.2015Jaspal Singh, son of Sh. Ram Partap, resident of Q. No.207, Type III, Power Colony, Rupnagar. ......Complainant VersusFullerton India Bank (Branch No...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-06-2015
Bajaj Allianz Icici Lombard Bajaj Fullerton India Icici
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate N.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate JAI KANWAR & ANIL SIDHER
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.CC/263 of 2014 Instituted on:30.09.2015 Date of order:12.06.2015Gopi Ram Sharma S/o Shri Ram Dass Sharma, R/o House no. 538/31, Gali No. 7, New Court Road, Ashok Vihar, Sonepat. ...Complainant.VersusM/s ...
Case Number: 263
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D. SATHIYA RAJ
Respondant Advocate B. VIJAYALAKSHMI
BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI BEFORE THIRU.A.K.ANNAMALAI PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER TMT. P. BAKIYAVATHI MEMBER F.A.256/2014[Against the Order in C.C No.134/2013 dated 30.7...
Case Number: 256
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Fullerton India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Fullerton India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Fullerton India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.