
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. BENO BENCIGAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. KOCHHAR & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2013 IN FA/217/20121. S. THANGARAJ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GENERAL MANAGER, FORD INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESID...
Case Number: 482
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/SMENON AND PAI
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/95(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/12/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/11/26 of District Kannur)1. FORD INDIA PVTLTDS.PCOIL POST,CHENGALPATTUCHENNAITN...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Suneel. S. Narayan
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/20701. H. M. Seetha Ramau S/o. H. S. Manjaiah Aged about 69 Years R/at NO. 71, 11th Cross, 10th Main, Near Av...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. BENO BENCIGAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. KOCHHAR & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 217 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/12/2011 in Complaint No. 40/2010 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. S. THANGARAJS/o. Subbiah, No. 3, Sri Rama Nilayam, Spurtank Road, Chetpet, Chennai-600031..........
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2013
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate K.K.Gopinathan
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/07/10451. Simon. K. FrancisKuttikadan House, Thottathil Lane, Fathima Nagar, ThrissurThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ford India Pvt Ltd , rep by the ManagerCustomer Relationship Center, For...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 616 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/11/2012 in Appeal No. 956/2011 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. ANIL CHANDRA GOWD...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. M/S. FORTUNE FORD & ANR............Resp...
Case Number: 616
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2013
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate V. SREENATH
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/54/20121. DR. V.G. GOVINDAN NAIRAMBADI, PO PATHAYIKKARA, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DIST............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. FORD INDIA[PVT] LTD, POST: S.P.KOIL, CHENGALPETTU, CHENNAI 603204.2. M/S. P.V.S. FOR LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGER, MENCHANDA, PO GOVERN...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. B.C. Goud
Respondant Advocate Mr. R. Pampapathi Reddy-R1
First Appeal No. FA/956/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/09/2011 in Case No. CC/490/2010 of District Hyderabad-II)1. Sri N. Anil Chandra Gowda s/o B. Narayana Gowd age 62 years occ:SAP consultant R/o Plot no.710, Rd 36 Jublee Hills Hyderabad............Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s. ...
Case Number: 956
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sunder Gupta
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/1721. Gurtej Singhson Gurcharan singh H.No.22249-A, Shant Nagar,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BHagat fordMansa road,Bathinda2....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S CONSULTA JURIS
Respondant Advocate R.Y.SHIRODKAR
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/2602(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/10/2006 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/05/105 of District Kolhapur)1. FORD INDIA PVT.LTD.,THROUGH VICE PRESIDENT MARKETING SHRI VIJAY PIP...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Ford in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Ford ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Ford under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.